Centre de Recherche en Démographie et Société, Bureau A-146, Université catholique de Louvain, Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium.
IRES, Université catholique de Louvain, Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium.
Am Econ Rev. 2015 Jun;105(6):1852-82. doi: 10.1257/aer.20120926.
We develop a theory of fertility, distinguishing its intensive margin from its extensive margin. The deep parameters are identified using facts from the 1990 US Census: (i) fertility of mothers decreases with education; (ii) childlessness exhibits a U-shaped relationship with education; (iii) the relationship between marriage rates and education is hump-shaped for women and increasing for men. We estimate that 2.5 percent of women were childless because of poverty and 8.1 percent because of high opportunity cost of childrearing. Over time, historical trends in total factor productivity and in education led to a U-shaped response in childlessness rates while fertility of mothers decreased.
我们提出了一个生育理论,区分了其密集边际和扩展边际。通过使用 1990 年美国人口普查的事实,我们确定了深层次参数:(i)母亲的生育率随教育程度的提高而下降;(ii)不育率与教育程度呈 U 型关系;(iii)女性的结婚率与教育程度呈驼峰型关系,而男性的结婚率则随教育程度的提高而上升。我们估计,有 2.5%的女性因贫困而不育,8.1%的女性因育儿机会成本高而不育。随着时间的推移,总要素生产率和教育方面的历史趋势导致不育率呈 U 型变化,而母亲的生育率则下降。