Department of Geriatric Care, Orthogeriatrics and Rehabilitation, Galliera Hospital, Genoa, Italy -
Department of Geriatric Care, Orthogeriatrics and Rehabilitation, Galliera Hospital, Genoa, Italy.
Panminerva Med. 2018 Sep;60(3):80-85. doi: 10.23736/S0031-0808.18.03408-0. Epub 2018 Mar 15.
To evaluate the prognostic accuracy of proadrenomedullin (proADM) in comparison with and in addition to the Multidimensional Prognostic Index (MPI), a validated predictive tool for mortality derived from a comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) to predict one-month mortality risk in older patients hospitalized with community-acquired pneumonia (CAP).
All patients aged 65 years and older, consecutively admitted to an acute geriatric ward with a diagnosis of CAP from February to July 2012. At admission and at discharge they were submitted to a standard CGA in order to calculate MPI. Moreover, plasma samples were taken at baseline and after one, three and five days of hospitalization for the analysis of pro-ADM.
Fifty patients (mean age 86.2±7.5 years), with 31 at high risk of mortality (MPI-3) were enrolled. ProADM and MPI, both at admission and at discharge, were significant predictor of mortality. As expected, MPI at admission showed lower predictive accuracy than MPI at discharge (survival C-statistic 0.667 vs. 0.851). The addition of proADM to the MPI at admission significantly increased accuracy in predicting one-month mortality (C-statistics from 0.667 to 0.731, P=0.018 at baseline; from 0.667 to 0.733, P=0.008 at 1 day; from 0.633 to 0.724; P=0.019 at 3 days; from 0.667 to 0.828; P=0.003 at 5 days). Conversely, adding pro-ADM to the MPI at discharge did not significantly improve the model's prognostic accuracy.
ProADM may significantly improve the prognostic accuracy of the MPI at admission in hospitalized elderly patients with CAP.
为了评估原肾上腺髓质素(proADM)的预后准确性,并与多维预后指数(MPI)进行比较,MPI 是一种经过验证的预测工具,源自全面的老年评估(CGA),用于预测因社区获得性肺炎(CAP)住院的老年患者的一个月死亡率风险。
2012 年 2 月至 7 月,连续收治年龄在 65 岁及以上、被诊断为 CAP 的急性老年病房患者。入院时和出院时,他们接受了标准的 CGA 检查,以计算 MPI。此外,在住院后第 1、3 和 5 天采集血浆样本,用于分析 pro-ADM。
共纳入 50 例患者(平均年龄 86.2±7.5 岁),其中 31 例死亡风险较高(MPI-3)。入院和出院时的 proADM 和 MPI 都是死亡的显著预测因子。正如预期的那样,入院时的 MPI 显示出比出院时的 MPI 更低的预测准确性(生存 C 统计量 0.667 与 0.851)。在入院时将 proADM 加入 MPI 可显著提高预测一个月死亡率的准确性(C 统计量从 0.667 增加到 0.731,P=0.018 时为基线;从 0.667 增加到 0.733,P=0.008 时为第 1 天;从 0.633 增加到 0.724,P=0.019 时为第 3 天;从 0.667 增加到 0.828,P=0.003 时为第 5 天)。相反,将 pro-ADM 添加到出院时的 MPI 并不能显著提高模型的预后准确性。
在因 CAP 住院的老年患者中,proADM 可能显著提高入院时 MPI 的预后准确性。