Department of Odontology, School of Dentistry, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa.
Department of Odontology, School of Dentistry, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa.
J Endod. 2018 May;44(5):853-855. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2018.01.017. Epub 2018 Mar 15.
The aim of this study was to compare the glide path preparation times of stainless steel hand files, PathFiles (Dentsply Sirona, Ballaigues, Switzerland), and the WaveOne Gold Glider (Dentsply Sirona). The preparation times for final root canal shaping with the Primary WaveOne Gold instrument in extracted human molar teeth with and without prior glide path preparation were also recorded and compared.
Mesiobuccal canals of 60 extracted human mandibular molars (curvature angles between 25° and 35° and radii <10 mm) were selected and randomly divided into 4 groups with 15 canals each. Canals were negotiated to patency with a #8 K-file. Canal preparations were performed by a single operator using precurved #10-15-20 stainless steel manual K-files (the K-file group), a #10 stainless steel manual K-file followed by PathFiles #1-3 (the PathFile group), a #10 stainless steel manual K-file followed by WaveOne Gold Glider (the WaveOne Gold Glider group), or no further glide path preparation. Final canal preparation of all 60 canals was performed with the Primary WaveOne Gold instrument. Glide path and final preparation times were recorded.
Glide path enlargement was statistically significantly fastest in the WaveOne Gold Glider group (19.7 ± 5.6 seconds) followed by the PathFile group (41.0 ± 6.8 seconds) and then the K-file group (81.2 ± 26.3 seconds) using analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Kruskal-Wallis tests (P < .0001). No statistically significant difference in the mean final preparation times was found among the WaveOne Gold Glider (23.1 ± 6.0 seconds), PathFile (24.4 ± 4.9 seconds), and K-file groups (27.2 ± 9.5 seconds). All 3 groups were statistically significantly faster than the no glide path preparation group (35.4 ± 10.2 seconds) using ANOVA (P = .0004) and Kruskal-Wallis tests (P = .0010).
Preparation time with the Primary WaveOne Gold file was statistically significantly reduced when the file was used in combination with any of the glide path preparation techniques. The WaveOne Gold Glider performed statistically significantly faster in glide path preparation time than the other glide path preparation techniques.
本研究旨在比较不锈钢手用锉、PathFiles(登士柏西诺德,Ballaigues,瑞士)和 WaveOne Gold Glider 在预备光滑髓腔过程中的预备时间。同时还记录并比较了在没有或有预先预备光滑髓腔的情况下,使用 Primary WaveOne Gold 器械对提取的下颌磨牙进行最终根管成形的预备时间。
选择 60 颗下颌磨牙的近中颊根管(弯曲角度为 25°-35°,半径<10mm),随机分为 4 组,每组 15 个根管。使用 #8 K 锉将根管预备至通畅。由一名操作人员使用预弯的 #10-15-20 不锈钢手动 K 锉(K 锉组)、#10 不锈钢手动 K 锉加 PathFiles #1-3(PathFile 组)、#10 不锈钢手动 K 锉加 WaveOne Gold Glider(WaveOne Gold Glider 组)或不进行进一步的预备光滑髓腔预备,对所有 60 个根管进行根管预备。使用 Primary WaveOne Gold 器械对所有 60 个根管进行最终的根管预备。记录预备光滑髓腔和最终预备的时间。
使用方差分析(ANOVA)和 Kruskal-Wallis 检验(P<.0001),WaveOne Gold Glider 组(19.7±5.6 秒)的预备光滑髓腔时间明显最快,其次是 PathFile 组(41.0±6.8 秒)和 K 锉组(81.2±26.3 秒)。在最终预备时间方面,WaveOne Gold Glider 组(23.1±6.0 秒)、PathFile 组(24.4±4.9 秒)和 K 锉组(27.2±9.5 秒)之间无统计学差异。所有 3 组均明显快于无预备光滑髓腔组(35.4±10.2 秒),差异具有统计学意义(ANOVA,P=.0004;Kruskal-Wallis 检验,P=.0010)。
在使用 Primary WaveOne Gold 锉时,结合任何一种预备光滑髓腔技术,均可显著减少预备时间。在预备光滑髓腔时间方面,WaveOne Gold Glider 明显快于其他预备光滑髓腔技术。