Sushruth Shetty, Vijayakumar Chellappa, Srinivasan Krishnamachari, Raj Kumar Nagarajan, Balasubramaniyan Gopal, Verma Surendra K, Ramesh A
Surgery, Jawaharlal Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education and Research (JIPMER), Puducherry, India.
Pathology, Jawaharlal Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education and Research (JIPMER), Puducherry, India.
Cureus. 2018 Jan 15;10(1):e2070. doi: 10.7759/cureus.2070.
Background Right iliac fossa (RIF) pain is one of the most common modalities of presentation to surgical emergency. It remains a challenge to the treating clinicians to accurately diagnose or to rule out appendicitis. Objective The aim of the study was to compare the efficacy of clinical impression, biochemical markers, and imaging in the diagnosis of RIF pain with special reference to appendicitis and their implication in reducing the negative appendicectomy rates. Methods All patients presenting to casualty with RIF pain were included in the study. Blood investigations including C-reactive protein (CRP), serum bilirubin, white blood cell counts (WBC), and ultrasound (USG) were done. Based on the clinical impression, patients were either posted for appendicectomy or observed in equivocal cases. Patients who had recurrent pain on follow-up underwent appendicectomy or underwent contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CECT) in equivocal cases. Patients who only had a single self-limiting episode with no other alternative diagnosis or had a normal CECT report were included in a non-specific RIF pain group. Results The negative appendicectomy rate was 8.2%. The mean value of WBC counts (9.57x109/L vs 7.88x109/L; p<0.05) and that of serum bilirubin (1.37 mg/dl vs 0.89mg/dl; p<0.05) in the appendicitis and non-appendicitis group, respectively, were statistically significant. The percentage of CRP positivity was higher in the appendicitis group (51.9% vs 15%; p<0.05). The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) for USG (84.2%, 77.17%, 85.4%, and 75.5%), for CRP (51.8%, 85%, 82%, and 57%), for WBC count (45.1%, 88%, 86.6%, and 48.3%), and for serum bilirubin (69.2%, 75%, 81.4%, and 60.5%) were statistically significant between the groups. Conclusion Imaging and biochemical investigations including bilirubin can act as useful adjuncts to the clinical diagnosis of appendicitis.
右下腹(RIF)疼痛是外科急诊最常见的症状之一。对于治疗的临床医生而言,准确诊断或排除阑尾炎仍然是一项挑战。目的:本研究旨在比较临床印象、生化标志物和影像学检查在诊断RIF疼痛(特别针对阑尾炎)方面的效果,以及它们对降低阴性阑尾切除率的意义。方法:所有因RIF疼痛到急诊就诊的患者均纳入本研究。进行了包括C反应蛋白(CRP)、血清胆红素、白细胞计数(WBC)的血液检查以及超声(USG)检查。根据临床印象,明确诊断的患者接受阑尾切除术,可疑病例则进行观察。随访期间复发疼痛的患者接受阑尾切除术,可疑病例则进行增强CT(CECT)检查。仅有单次自限性发作且无其他可替代诊断或CECT报告正常的患者被纳入非特异性RIF疼痛组。结果:阴性阑尾切除率为8.2%。阑尾炎组和非阑尾炎组的白细胞计数平均值(分别为9.57×10⁹/L和7.88×10⁹/L;p<0.05)以及血清胆红素平均值(分别为1.37mg/dl和0.89mg/dl;p<0.05)在统计学上具有显著差异。阑尾炎组的CRP阳性率更高(51.9%对15%;p<0.05)。USG的敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值(PPV)和阴性预测值(NPV)(分别为84.2%、77.17%、85.4%和75.5%)、CRP(分别为51.8%、85%、82%和57%)、WBC计数(分别为45.1%、88%、86.6%和48.3%)以及血清胆红素(分别为69.2%、75%、81.4%和60.5%)在组间具有统计学显著差异。结论:包括胆红素在内的影像学和生化检查可作为阑尾炎临床诊断的有用辅助手段。