Suppr超能文献

短期度洛西汀治疗成人广泛性焦虑障碍的疗效和耐受性:一项荟萃分析。

Efficacy and tolerability of short-term duloxetine treatment in adults with generalized anxiety disorder: A meta-analysis.

机构信息

Department of Neurology, Neuroscience Centre, the First Teaching Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, China.

China-Japan Union Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, China.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2018 Mar 20;13(3):e0194501. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0194501. eCollection 2018.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the efficacy and tolerability of duloxetine during short-term treatment in adults with generalized anxiety disorder (GAD).

METHODS

We conducted a comprehensive literature review of the PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Web of Science, and ClinicalTrials databases for randomized controlled trials(RCTs) comparing duloxetine or duloxetine plus other antipsychotics with placebo for the treatment of GAD in adults. Outcome measures were (1) efficacy, assessed by the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale(HADS) anxiety subscale score, the Hamilton Rating Scale for Anxiety(HAM-A) psychic and somatic anxiety factor scores, and response and remission rates based on total scores of HAM-A; (2) tolerability, assessed by discontinuation rate due to adverse events, the incidence of treatment emergent adverse events(TEAEs) and serious adverse events(SAEs). Review Manager 5.3 and Stata Version 12.0 software were used for all statistical analyses.

RESULTS

The meta-analysis included 8 RCTs. Mean changes in the HADS anxiety subscale score [mean difference(MD) = 2.32, 95% confidence interval(CI) 1.77-2.88, P<0.00001] and HAM-A psychic anxiety factor score were significantly greater in patients with GAD that received duloxetine compared to those that received placebo (MD = 2.15, 95%CI 1.61-2.68, P<0.00001). However, there was no difference in mean change in the HAM-A somatic anxiety factor score (MD = 1.13, 95%CI 0.67-1.58, P<0.00001). Discontinuation rate due to AEs in the duloxetine group was significantly higher than the placebo group [odds ratio(OR) = 2.62, 95%CI 1.35-5.06, P = 0.004]. The incidence of any TEAE was significantly increased in patients that received duloxetine (OR = 1.76, 95%CI 1.36-2.28, P<0.0001), but there was no significant difference in the incidence of SAEs (OR = 1.13, 95%CI 0.52-2.47, P = 0.75).

CONCLUSION

Duloxetine resulted in a greater improvement in symptoms of psychic anxiety and similar changes in symptoms of somatic anxiety compared to placebo during short-term treatment in adults with GAD and its tolerability was acceptable.

摘要

目的

研究度洛西汀在治疗成人广泛性焦虑障碍(GAD)短期治疗中的疗效和耐受性。

方法

我们对 PubMed、Embase、Cochrane 中央对照试验注册库、Web of Science 和 ClinicalTrials.gov 数据库进行了全面的文献检索,以纳入比较度洛西汀或度洛西汀联合其他抗精神病药与安慰剂治疗成人 GAD 的随机对照试验(RCT)。结局指标为:(1)采用汉密尔顿焦虑量表(HAMA)焦虑因子评分、HADS 焦虑亚量表评分和 HAMA 总分的应答率和缓解率评估疗效;(2)采用因不良反应停药率、治疗中出现的不良事件(TEAE)发生率和严重不良事件(SAE)发生率评估耐受性。采用 Review Manager 5.3 和 Stata 版本 12.0 软件进行所有统计学分析。

结果

该 meta 分析纳入了 8 项 RCT。与安慰剂相比,接受度洛西汀治疗的 GAD 患者的 HADS 焦虑亚量表评分[均数差(MD)=2.32,95%置信区间(CI)1.77-2.88,P<0.00001]和 HAMA 精神焦虑因子评分的变化更明显(MD=2.15,95%CI 1.61-2.68,P<0.00001)。然而,HAMA 躯体焦虑因子评分的平均变化无差异(MD=1.13,95%CI 0.67-1.58,P<0.00001)。度洛西汀组因不良反应停药率显著高于安慰剂组[比值比(OR)=2.62,95%CI 1.35-5.06,P=0.004]。接受度洛西汀治疗的患者发生任何 TEAE 的发生率显著增加(OR=1.76,95%CI 1.36-2.28,P<0.0001),但 SAE 的发生率无显著差异(OR=1.13,95%CI 0.52-2.47,P=0.75)。

结论

与安慰剂相比,度洛西汀在成人 GAD 的短期治疗中能显著改善精神焦虑症状,对躯体焦虑症状的改善程度相似,且其耐受性可接受。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/22c2/5860757/0746dbf2e8a1/pone.0194501.g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验