Naganuma Masaki, Inatomi Yuichiro, Nakajima Makoto, Yonehara Toshiro, Ando Yukio
Department of Neurology, Saiseikai Kumamoto Hospital, Kumamoto, Japan.
Department of Neurology, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kumamoto University, Kumamoto, Japan.
Cerebrovasc Dis. 2018;45(3-4):115-123. doi: 10.1159/000488038. Epub 2018 Mar 20.
Uric acid (UA), an antioxidant with neuroprotective effects, favorably affects stroke outcome. However, the effect has not been examined in patients treated with edaravone, a frequently used free radical scavenger. We investigated whether the use of edaravone affected the relationship between UA levels and outcome in acute ischemic stroke.
We retrospectively evaluated 1,114 consecutive ischemic stroke patients with premorbid modified Rankin Scale (mRS) scores <2 admitted within 24 h of onset (mean, 74 years; median UA levels, 333 μmol/L). We divided the patients into 2 groups using the median UA value as a cutoff, a low UA group (≤333 μmol/L; n = 566) and a high UA group (>333 μmol/L; n = 548), and compared their clinical characteristics and favorable outcomes (mRS <2) at 90 days. We investigated the associations between UA levels and 90-day stroke outcome in patients with and without edaravone treatment.
The high UA group had a higher proportion of men, hypertension, atrial fibrillation, and cardioembolic stroke than the low UA group. The high UA group also had a higher proportion of patients with mRS <2 at 90 days (61.5 vs. 54.1%, p = 0.013), but the significance was diminished in multivariate analysis (OR 1.30, 95% CI 0.94-1.71). In subgroup analysis, the high UA group without edaravone exhibited a higher proportion of patients with mRS <2 at 90 days than the low UA group (OR 2.87, 95% CI 1.20-7.16). The high UA group with edaravone did not exhibit this difference.
In acute ischemic stroke, the favorable association between high UA levels and outcome at 90 days was not evident in patients treated with edaravone.
尿酸(UA)是一种具有神经保护作用的抗氧化剂,对中风预后有积极影响。然而,在常用的自由基清除剂依达拉奉治疗的患者中,这种影响尚未得到研究。我们调查了依达拉奉的使用是否会影响急性缺血性中风患者尿酸水平与预后之间的关系。
我们回顾性评估了1114例发病24小时内入院的急性缺血性中风患者,这些患者病前改良Rankin量表(mRS)评分<2(平均年龄74岁;UA中位数水平为333μmol/L)。我们以UA中位数作为分界值将患者分为两组,低UA组(≤333μmol/L;n = 566)和高UA组(>333μmol/L;n = 548),并比较了他们的临床特征和90天时的良好预后(mRS<2)情况。我们研究了接受和未接受依达拉奉治疗的患者尿酸水平与90天中风预后之间的关联。
高UA组男性、高血压、心房颤动和心源性栓塞性中风的比例高于低UA组。高UA组90天时mRS<2的患者比例也更高(61.5%对54.1%,p = 0.013),但在多变量分析中这种显著性降低(比值比1.30,95%置信区间0.94 - 1.71)。在亚组分析中,未接受依达拉奉治疗的高UA组90天时mRS<2的患者比例高于低UA组(比值比2.87,95%置信区间1.20 - 7.16)。接受依达拉奉治疗的高UA组未表现出这种差异。
在急性缺血性中风中,接受依达拉奉治疗的患者中,高尿酸水平与90天预后之间的良好关联不明显。