Department of Human Nutrition, University of Otago, PO Box 56, Dunedin, New Zealand.
Department of Food Science, University of Otago, PO Box 56, Dunedin, New Zealand.
Eur J Clin Nutr. 2018 Dec;72(12):1717-1723. doi: 10.1038/s41430-018-0134-x. Epub 2018 Mar 20.
BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: The European Food Safety Authority approved a health claim (ID558) relating to lowered postprandial glycaemia when fructose replaces 30% of sucrose in foods and beverages. We assessed the effects of partial replacement of sucrose with fructose on serum glucose, uric acid and blood pressure.
SUBJECTS/METHODS: A randomised, crossover, double blind trial of 12 normoglycaemic participants consuming beverages containing 50 g blends of fructose and sucrose in proportions; 67% sucrose/33% fructose (67%S:33%F); 50% each (50%S:50%F) and 33%S:67%F; a 100% sucrose reference beverage was tested twice. Serum glucose and uric acid concentrations were measured at 0, 15, 30, 45, 60, 90 and 120 min and incremental area-under-the-curve (iAUC) calculated.
The geometric mean (95% CI) glycaemic iAUC following the 100% sucrose, 67%S:33%F, 50%S:50%F and 33%S:67%F blended beverages were 96 (63,145), 71 (46,109), 60 (39, 93) and 39 (12, 86) mmol/L min, respectively. At 33% fructose replacement, the proportionally lower iAUC of -28.5% (95% CI: -62.1, 5.2) mmol/L min was not different to sucrose alone. The response was lowered by fructose replacement of 50 and 67% and overall there was an inverse association (p < 0.001). The mean uricaemic iAUC to the respective beverages were 1320 (393, 2248), 3062 (1553, 4570), 3646 (2446, 4847), 3623 (2020, 5226) µmol/L min. Uric acid concentration was raised by all fructose-containing beverages with 33% fructose replacement causing an increase of 1741 (95% CI: 655, 2829) µmol/L min compared with sucrose alone. Blood pressure was not different among beverages.
Reduced postprandial glycaemia was achieved by the substitution of sucrose with fructose although elevated uricaemic responses should be cautioned.
背景/目的:欧洲食品安全局批准了一项健康声称(ID558),即当果糖替代食物和饮料中 30%的蔗糖时,餐后血糖会降低。我们评估了部分用果糖替代蔗糖对血清葡萄糖、尿酸和血压的影响。
受试者/方法:对 12 名血糖正常的参与者进行了一项随机、交叉、双盲试验,让他们饮用含有果糖和蔗糖混合物的饮料,混合物中果糖和蔗糖的比例分别为 67%蔗糖/33%果糖(67%S:33%F)、各 50%(50%S:50%F)和 33%蔗糖/67%果糖(33%S:67%F);还测试了一种 100%蔗糖的参考饮料,每种饮料均测试两次。在 0、15、30、45、60、90 和 120 分钟时测量血清葡萄糖和尿酸浓度,并计算增量曲线下面积(iAUC)。
100%蔗糖、67%S:33%F、50%S:50%F 和 33%S:67%F 混合饮料的血糖 iAUC 几何平均值(95%CI)分别为 96(63,145)、71(46,109)、60(39,93)和 39(12,86)mmol/L·min。果糖替代 33%时,-28.5%(95%CI:-62.1,5.2)mmol/L·min 的 iAUC 比例降低与单独使用蔗糖没有差异。果糖替代 50%和 67%时,反应降低,整体呈负相关(p<0.001)。相应饮料的尿酸 iAUC 平均值分别为 1320(393,2248)、3062(1553,4570)、3646(2446,4847)、3623(2020,5226)µmol/L·min。所有含果糖的饮料均使尿酸浓度升高,与单独使用蔗糖相比,果糖替代 33%时尿酸浓度升高 1741(95%CI:655,2829)µmol/L·min。血压在各饮料间无差异。
虽然用果糖替代蔗糖可以降低餐后血糖,但应注意尿酸升高的反应。