Myeroff Chad M, Anderson Jeffrey P, Sveom Daniel S, Switzer Julie A
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
HealthPartners Institute, Bloomington, MN, USA.
Geriatr Orthop Surg Rehabil. 2017 Aug 31;9:2151458517728155. doi: 10.1177/2151458517728155. eCollection 2018.
Known possible consequences of proximal humerus fractures include impaired shoulder function, decreased independence, and increased risk for mortality. The purpose of this report is to describe the survival and independence of elderly patients with fractures of the proximal humerus, treated in our institution, relative to patient characteristics and treatment method.
Retrospective cohort study from 2006 to 2012.
Community-based hospital with level 1 designation.
PATIENTS/PARTICIPANTS: Three hundred nineteen patients ≥60 years who presented to the emergency department with an isolated fracture of the proximal humerus were either admitted to the inpatient ward for the organization and provision of immediate definitive care or discharged with the expectation of coordination of their care as an outpatient. Treatment was nonoperative or operative.
One- and 2-year mortality.
Significant predictors of mortality at 1 year included Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI; continuous, hazard ratio [HR] = 1.40; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.06-1.86), body mass index (BMI; <25 vs ≥25; HR = 3.43; 95% CI: 1.45-8.14), and American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) disease severity score (3-4 vs 1-2; HR = 4.48; 95% CI: 1.21-16.55). In addition to CCI and BMI, reliance on a cane/walker/wheelchair at the time of fracture predicted mortality at 2 years (vs unassisted ambulation; HR = 3.13; 95% CI: 1.59-5.88). Although the Neer classification of fracture severity significantly correlated with inpatient admission ( < .001), it was not significantly associated with mortality or with loss of living or ambulatory independence. Among admitted patients, 64% were discharged to a facility with a higher level of care than their prefracture living facility. Twenty percent of study patients experienced a loss in ambulatory status by at least 1 level at 1 year postfracture.
In a cohort of elderly patients with fractures of the proximal humerus, patient characteristics including comorbidities, ASA classification, and lower BMI were associated with increased mortality. Specifically, those admitted at the time of fracture and treated nonoperatively had the highest mortality rate and, likely, represent the frailest cohort. Those initially treated as outpatients and later treated operatively had the lowest mortality and, likely, represent the healthiest cohort. These data are inherently biased by prefracture comorbidities but help stratify our patients' mortality risk at the time of injury.
肱骨近端骨折已知的可能后果包括肩部功能受损、独立性下降以及死亡风险增加。本报告的目的是描述在我们机构接受治疗的肱骨近端骨折老年患者的生存率和独立性,以及患者特征和治疗方法之间的关系。
2006年至2012年的回顾性队列研究。
一级指定的社区医院。
患者/参与者:319名60岁及以上因孤立性肱骨近端骨折到急诊科就诊的患者,要么被收入住院病房接受组织并提供即时确定性治疗,要么出院并期望作为门诊患者协调其护理。治疗方法为非手术或手术。
1年和2年死亡率。
1年死亡率的显著预测因素包括查尔森合并症指数(CCI;连续变量,风险比[HR]=1.40;95%置信区间[CI]:1.06-1.86)、体重指数(BMI;<25与≥25;HR=3.43;95%CI:1.45-8.14)以及美国麻醉医师协会(ASA)疾病严重程度评分(3-4与1-2;HR=4.48;95%CI:1.21-16.55)。除CCI和BMI外,骨折时依赖手杖/助行器/轮椅可预测2年死亡率(与独立行走相比;HR=3.13;95%CI:1.59-5.88)。虽然骨折严重程度的Neer分类与住院显著相关(P<.001),但与死亡率、生活或行走独立性丧失无显著关联。在入院患者中,64%出院后前往比骨折前居住机构护理级别更高的机构。20%的研究患者在骨折后1年时行走状态至少下降1个等级。
在一组肱骨近端骨折的老年患者中,包括合并症、ASA分类和较低BMI等患者特征与死亡率增加相关。具体而言,骨折时入院并接受非手术治疗的患者死亡率最高,可能代表最虚弱的队列。最初作为门诊患者治疗,后来接受手术治疗的患者死亡率最低,可能代表最健康的队列。这些数据因骨折前合并症而固有地存在偏差,但有助于在受伤时对患者的死亡风险进行分层。