a Department of Health Policy and Management , Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health , Baltimore , MD , USA.
b Johns Hopkins Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center , Baltimore , MD , USA.
Curr Med Res Opin. 2018 Dec;34(12):2031-2039. doi: 10.1080/03007995.2018.1456414. Epub 2018 Apr 27.
Objective Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is a progressive blood cancer with few effective treatment options. As part of a patient-focused drug development (PFDD) initiative led by the Leukemia and Lymphoma Society (LLS), this study sought to use a community-centered approach to develop and pilot an instrument to measure patient preferences for the benefits and risks of treating AML. Methods Instrument development was informed by a literature review, engagement with expert stakeholders (n = 12), engagement with community stakeholders, and pre-testing. A discrete-choice experiment (DCE), in which participants made choices between 16 pairs of hypothetical treatments, was developed with five attributes: event-free survival, complete remission, time in hospital, short-term side-effects, and long-term side-effects. A pilot test was conducted and analyzed using conditional logistic regression. Results are presented using relative attribute importance (RAI) scores. Results Patients with AML and caregivers were engaged in developing (n = 15), pre-testing (n = 13), and pilot testing (n = 26) the instrument. The pilot included patients with AML (n = 18) and caregivers of living or deceased patients with AML (n = 8). Participants had a mean age of 50 years (range =24-81), and were mostly college educated (n = 22), privately insured (n = 21), and employed (n = 13). Based on the DCE, complete remission was identified as the most important attribute (RAI =10), followed by event-free survival (3.7), time in hospital (2.8), long-term side-effects (2.3), and short-term side-effects (2.1). Conclusion The mixed-methods approach to PFDD was welcomed by all stakeholders and there was strong endorsement to implement this DCE as part of a national survey. Key points for decision makers The Leukemia and Lymphoma Society (LLS) initiated an independent effort to promote patient-focused drug development (PFDD). This study presents the development and piloting of a preference study as a first step in this initiative. Results of this pilot study were used to guide a PFDD meeting to discuss the lived experience of patients and caregivers affected by AML. Productive engagement by all patients, caregivers, and stakeholders throughout the process resulted in strong endorsement of the project's approach and recognition of the need to conduct a national study.
目的 急性髓系白血病(AML)是一种进展性血液癌,治疗选择有限。作为由白血病和淋巴瘤协会(LLS)领导的以患者为中心的药物开发(PFDD)计划的一部分,本研究旨在采用以社区为中心的方法来开发和试点一种衡量患者对治疗 AML 的益处和风险的偏好的工具。
方法 该工具的开发依据文献综述、与专家利益相关者(n=12)的接触、与社区利益相关者的接触以及预测试。通过离散选择实验(DCE)开发了 16 对假设治疗方法的选择,该实验具有五个属性:无事件生存、完全缓解、住院时间、短期副作用和长期副作用。使用条件逻辑回归对试点进行了分析。使用相对属性重要性(RAI)评分呈现结果。
结果 参与开发(n=15)、预测试(n=13)和试点测试(n=26)该工具的 AML 患者及其护理人员。该试点包括 AML 患者(n=18)和 AML 存活或已故患者的护理人员(n=8)。参与者的平均年龄为 50 岁(范围为 24-81 岁),大多数受过大学教育(n=22)、私人保险(n=21)和受雇(n=13)。根据 DCE,完全缓解被确定为最重要的属性(RAI=10),其次是无事件生存(3.7)、住院时间(2.8)、长期副作用(2.3)和短期副作用(2.1)。
结论 所有利益相关者都欢迎采用混合方法进行 PFDD,强烈支持将该 DCE 作为全国调查的一部分实施。
决策者要点 白血病和淋巴瘤协会(LLS)发起了一项独立的努力,以促进以患者为中心的药物开发(PFDD)。本研究介绍了作为该倡议第一步的偏好研究的开发和试点。该试点研究的结果用于指导 PFDD 会议,讨论受 AML 影响的患者和护理人员的生活体验。整个过程中所有患者、护理人员和利益相关者的积极参与导致强烈支持该项目的方法,并认识到需要进行全国性研究。