• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Developing an instrument to assess patient preferences for benefits and risks of treating acute myeloid leukemia to promote patient-focused drug development.开发一种评估患者对治疗急性髓细胞白血病的获益和风险偏好的工具,以促进以患者为中心的药物开发。
Curr Med Res Opin. 2018 Dec;34(12):2031-2039. doi: 10.1080/03007995.2018.1456414. Epub 2018 Apr 27.
2
Developing and piloting an instrument to prioritize the worries of patients with acute myeloid leukemia.开发并试用一种工具,以确定急性髓系白血病患者担忧事项的优先级。
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2018 Apr 27;12:647-655. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S151752. eCollection 2018.
3
Age at Diagnosis and Patient Preferences for Treatment Outcomes in AML: A Discrete Choice Experiment to Explore Meaningful Benefits.诊断时的年龄与 AML 患者对治疗结果的偏好:探索有意义获益的离散选择实验。
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2020 May;29(5):942-948. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-19-1277. Epub 2020 Mar 4.
4
A community-engaged approach to quantifying caregiver preferences for the benefits and risks of emerging therapies for Duchenne muscular dystrophy.一种社区参与式方法,用于量化护理人员对杜氏肌营养不良症新兴疗法的益处和风险的偏好。
Clin Ther. 2014 May;36(5):624-37. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2014.04.011.
5
Side effects from acute myeloid leukemia treatment: results from a national survey.急性髓系白血病治疗的副作用:全国性调查结果。
Curr Med Res Opin. 2019 Nov;35(11):1965-1970. doi: 10.1080/03007995.2019.1631149. Epub 2019 Jun 26.
6
Prioritizing the worries of AML patients: Quantifying patient experience using best-worst scaling.优先考虑 AML 患者的担忧:使用最佳最差标度法量化患者体验。
Psychooncology. 2021 Jul;30(7):1104-1111. doi: 10.1002/pon.5652. Epub 2021 Feb 27.
7
How Do Members of the Duchenne and Becker Muscular Dystrophy Community Perceive a Discrete-Choice Experiment Incorporating Uncertain Treatment Benefit? An Application of Research as an Event.杜氏和贝克肌营养不良症社群成员如何看待纳入不确定治疗获益的离散选择实验?以事件为研究的应用。
Patient. 2019 Apr;12(2):247-257. doi: 10.1007/s40271-018-0330-8.
8
Care Management for Youth With Comorbid Developmental and Mental Health Conditions: A Discrete Choice Experiment Pilot Study.共病发育和心理健康状况的青年照护管理:离散选择实验初步研究。
Acad Pediatr. 2020 Mar;20(2):241-249. doi: 10.1016/j.acap.2019.05.127. Epub 2019 May 23.
9
Patient preferences for heart valve disease intervention.患者对心脏瓣膜病干预的偏好。
Health Expect. 2024 Feb;27(1):e13929. doi: 10.1111/hex.13929. Epub 2023 Dec 4.
10
Understanding the experience, treatment preferences and goals of people living with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) in Australia.了解澳大利亚慢性淋巴细胞白血病 (CLL) 患者的体验、治疗偏好和目标。
BMC Cancer. 2024 Jul 11;24(1):831. doi: 10.1186/s12885-024-12589-9.

引用本文的文献

1
Pretesting Discrete-Choice Experiments: A Guide for Researchers.预测试离散选择实验:研究人员指南。
Patient. 2024 Mar;17(2):109-120. doi: 10.1007/s40271-024-00672-z. Epub 2024 Feb 16.
2
Development of a Patient-Centered Preference Tool for Patients With Hematologic Malignancies: Protocol for a Mixed Methods Study.开发针对血液系统恶性肿瘤患者的以患者为中心的偏好工具:一项混合方法研究的方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2022 Jun 29;11(6):e39586. doi: 10.2196/39586.
3
A Systematic Review of Discrete Choice Experiments in Oncology Treatments.肿瘤治疗中离散选择实验的系统评价。
Patient. 2021 Nov;14(6):775-790. doi: 10.1007/s40271-021-00520-4. Epub 2021 May 5.
4
Prioritizing the worries of AML patients: Quantifying patient experience using best-worst scaling.优先考虑 AML 患者的担忧:使用最佳最差标度法量化患者体验。
Psychooncology. 2021 Jul;30(7):1104-1111. doi: 10.1002/pon.5652. Epub 2021 Feb 27.
5
Utilising Patient and Public Involvement in Stated Preference Research in Health: Learning from the Existing Literature and a Case Study.利用患者和公众参与在健康状况下的意愿调查研究:从现有文献和案例研究中学习。
Patient. 2021 Jul;14(4):399-412. doi: 10.1007/s40271-020-00439-2.
6
Age at Diagnosis and Patient Preferences for Treatment Outcomes in AML: A Discrete Choice Experiment to Explore Meaningful Benefits.诊断时的年龄与 AML 患者对治疗结果的偏好:探索有意义获益的离散选择实验。
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2020 May;29(5):942-948. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-19-1277. Epub 2020 Mar 4.
7
Using Social Media to Uncover Treatment Experiences and Decisions in Patients With Acute Myeloid Leukemia or Myelodysplastic Syndrome Who Are Ineligible for Intensive Chemotherapy: Patient-Centric Qualitative Data Analysis.利用社交媒体揭示不符合强化化疗条件的急性髓系白血病或骨髓增生异常综合征患者的治疗经历和决策:以患者为中心的定性数据分析
J Med Internet Res. 2019 Nov 22;21(11):e14285. doi: 10.2196/14285.
8
Patient-Centered Insights on Treatment Decision Making and Living with Acute Myeloid Leukemia and Other Hematologic Cancers.患者对急性髓系白血病和其他血液系统癌症的治疗决策和生活的看法。
Patient. 2020 Feb;13(1):83-102. doi: 10.1007/s40271-019-00384-9.
9
How Do Members of the Duchenne and Becker Muscular Dystrophy Community Perceive a Discrete-Choice Experiment Incorporating Uncertain Treatment Benefit? An Application of Research as an Event.杜氏和贝克肌营养不良症社群成员如何看待纳入不确定治疗获益的离散选择实验?以事件为研究的应用。
Patient. 2019 Apr;12(2):247-257. doi: 10.1007/s40271-018-0330-8.

本文引用的文献

1
Health-Related Quality of Life of Patients with Acute Myeloid Leukemia: A Systematic Literature Review.急性髓系白血病患者的健康相关生活质量:一项系统文献综述
Oncol Ther. 2017;5(1):1-16. doi: 10.1007/s40487-016-0039-6. Epub 2017 Jan 27.
2
Giving Patients' Preferences a Voice in Medical Treatment Life Cycle: The PREFER Public-Private Project.让患者的偏好贯穿医疗治疗生命周期:PREFER公私合作项目。
Patient. 2017 Jun;10(3):263-266. doi: 10.1007/s40271-017-0222-3.
3
Developing a Patient-Centered Benefit-Risk Survey: A Community-Engaged Process.开展以患者为中心的获益-风险调查:一个社区参与的过程。
Value Health. 2016 Sep-Oct;19(6):751-757. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2016.02.014.
4
Patient Preferences in Regulatory Benefit-Risk Assessments: A US Perspective.监管效益-风险评估中的患者偏好:美国视角
Value Health. 2016 Sep-Oct;19(6):741-745. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2016.04.008.
5
Acute myeloid leukemia in the older adults.老年急性髓系白血病
Leuk Res Rep. 2016 Jun 16;6:1-7. doi: 10.1016/j.lrr.2016.06.001. eCollection 2016.
6
Statistical Methods for the Analysis of Discrete Choice Experiments: A Report of the ISPOR Conjoint Analysis Good Research Practices Task Force.离散选择实验分析的统计方法:药物经济学与结果研究国际协会联合分析良好研究实践特别工作组报告
Value Health. 2016 Jun;19(4):300-15. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2016.04.004. Epub 2016 May 12.
7
Acute myeloid leukaemia.急性髓细胞白血病。
Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2016 Mar 10;2:16010. doi: 10.1038/nrdp.2016.10.
8
A Framework for Instrument Development of a Choice Experiment: An Application to Type 2 Diabetes.一项选择实验的测量工具开发框架:在2型糖尿病中的应用
Patient. 2016 Oct;9(5):465-79. doi: 10.1007/s40271-016-0170-3.
9
Perceived Barriers and Potential Strategies to Improve Self-Management Among Adults with Type 2 Diabetes: A Community-Engaged Research Approach.2型糖尿病成年人自我管理的感知障碍与潜在策略:一种社区参与式研究方法
Patient. 2016 Aug;9(4):349-58. doi: 10.1007/s40271-016-0162-3.
10
Incorporating patient preferences into drug development and regulatory decision making: Results from a quantitative pilot study with cancer patients, carers, and regulators.将患者偏好纳入药物研发和监管决策:一项针对癌症患者、护理人员和监管者的定量试点研究结果
Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2016 May;99(5):548-54. doi: 10.1002/cpt.332. Epub 2016 Feb 17.

开发一种评估患者对治疗急性髓细胞白血病的获益和风险偏好的工具,以促进以患者为中心的药物开发。

Developing an instrument to assess patient preferences for benefits and risks of treating acute myeloid leukemia to promote patient-focused drug development.

机构信息

a Department of Health Policy and Management , Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health , Baltimore , MD , USA.

b Johns Hopkins Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center , Baltimore , MD , USA.

出版信息

Curr Med Res Opin. 2018 Dec;34(12):2031-2039. doi: 10.1080/03007995.2018.1456414. Epub 2018 Apr 27.

DOI:10.1080/03007995.2018.1456414
PMID:29565196
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8799376/
Abstract

Objective Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is a progressive blood cancer with few effective treatment options. As part of a patient-focused drug development (PFDD) initiative led by the Leukemia and Lymphoma Society (LLS), this study sought to use a community-centered approach to develop and pilot an instrument to measure patient preferences for the benefits and risks of treating AML. Methods Instrument development was informed by a literature review, engagement with expert stakeholders (n = 12), engagement with community stakeholders, and pre-testing. A discrete-choice experiment (DCE), in which participants made choices between 16 pairs of hypothetical treatments, was developed with five attributes: event-free survival, complete remission, time in hospital, short-term side-effects, and long-term side-effects. A pilot test was conducted and analyzed using conditional logistic regression. Results are presented using relative attribute importance (RAI) scores. Results Patients with AML and caregivers were engaged in developing (n = 15), pre-testing (n = 13), and pilot testing (n = 26) the instrument. The pilot included patients with AML (n = 18) and caregivers of living or deceased patients with AML (n = 8). Participants had a mean age of 50 years (range =24-81), and were mostly college educated (n = 22), privately insured (n = 21), and employed (n = 13). Based on the DCE, complete remission was identified as the most important attribute (RAI =10), followed by event-free survival (3.7), time in hospital (2.8), long-term side-effects (2.3), and short-term side-effects (2.1). Conclusion The mixed-methods approach to PFDD was welcomed by all stakeholders and there was strong endorsement to implement this DCE as part of a national survey. Key points for decision makers The Leukemia and Lymphoma Society (LLS) initiated an independent effort to promote patient-focused drug development (PFDD). This study presents the development and piloting of a preference study as a first step in this initiative. Results of this pilot study were used to guide a PFDD meeting to discuss the lived experience of patients and caregivers affected by AML. Productive engagement by all patients, caregivers, and stakeholders throughout the process resulted in strong endorsement of the project's approach and recognition of the need to conduct a national study.

摘要

目的 急性髓系白血病(AML)是一种进展性血液癌,治疗选择有限。作为由白血病和淋巴瘤协会(LLS)领导的以患者为中心的药物开发(PFDD)计划的一部分,本研究旨在采用以社区为中心的方法来开发和试点一种衡量患者对治疗 AML 的益处和风险的偏好的工具。

方法 该工具的开发依据文献综述、与专家利益相关者(n=12)的接触、与社区利益相关者的接触以及预测试。通过离散选择实验(DCE)开发了 16 对假设治疗方法的选择,该实验具有五个属性:无事件生存、完全缓解、住院时间、短期副作用和长期副作用。使用条件逻辑回归对试点进行了分析。使用相对属性重要性(RAI)评分呈现结果。

结果 参与开发(n=15)、预测试(n=13)和试点测试(n=26)该工具的 AML 患者及其护理人员。该试点包括 AML 患者(n=18)和 AML 存活或已故患者的护理人员(n=8)。参与者的平均年龄为 50 岁(范围为 24-81 岁),大多数受过大学教育(n=22)、私人保险(n=21)和受雇(n=13)。根据 DCE,完全缓解被确定为最重要的属性(RAI=10),其次是无事件生存(3.7)、住院时间(2.8)、长期副作用(2.3)和短期副作用(2.1)。

结论 所有利益相关者都欢迎采用混合方法进行 PFDD,强烈支持将该 DCE 作为全国调查的一部分实施。

决策者要点 白血病和淋巴瘤协会(LLS)发起了一项独立的努力,以促进以患者为中心的药物开发(PFDD)。本研究介绍了作为该倡议第一步的偏好研究的开发和试点。该试点研究的结果用于指导 PFDD 会议,讨论受 AML 影响的患者和护理人员的生活体验。整个过程中所有患者、护理人员和利益相关者的积极参与导致强烈支持该项目的方法,并认识到需要进行全国性研究。