Humbyrd Casey Jo
Foot and Ankle Division, the Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, the Department of Orthpaedic Surgery, the Johns Hopkins University/the Johns Hopkins Bayview Medical Center, Baltimore, Maryland USA.
J Clin Ethics. 2018 Spring;28(1):62-68.
The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services has initiated bundled payments for hip and knee total joint replacement in an effort to decrease healthcare costs and increase quality of care. The ethical implications of this program have not been studied. This article considers the ethics of patient selection to improve outcomes; specifically, screening patients by body mass index to determine eligibility for total joint replacement. I argue that this type of screening is not ethically defensible, and that the bundled payment program as structured is likely to lead to unfair restrictions on who receives total joint replacements.
医疗保险和医疗补助服务中心已启动针对髋关节和膝关节全关节置换的捆绑支付,以降低医疗成本并提高护理质量。该计划的伦理影响尚未得到研究。本文探讨了为改善治疗效果而进行患者选择的伦理问题;具体而言,通过身体质量指数对患者进行筛查以确定其全关节置换的资格。我认为这种筛查在伦理上是站不住脚的,而且现行的捆绑支付计划可能会导致接受全关节置换的人群受到不公平的限制。