Liang Chi-Wen
Department of Psychology, Chung Yuan Christian University, No. 200, Chung Pei Rd, Chung Li District, Taoyuan City, 32023, Taiwan, ROC.
J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry. 2018 Sep;60:46-52. doi: 10.1016/j.jbtep.2018.03.004. Epub 2018 Mar 19.
Attentional control has recently been assumed to play a critical role in the generation and maintenance of threat-related attentional bias and social anxiety. The present study aimed to investigate whether socially anxious (SA) individuals show impairments in attentional control functions, particularly in inhibition and shifting.
Forty-two SA and 41 non-anxious (NA) participants completed a mixed antisaccade task, a variant of the antisaccade task that is used to investigate inhibition as well as shifting functions.
The results showed that, overall, SA participants had longer antisaccade latencies than NA participants, but the two groups did not differ in their antisaccade error rates. Moreover, in the single-task block, SA participants had longer latencies than NA participants for antisaccade but not prosaccade trials. In the mixed-task block, the SA participants had longer latencies than the NA participants for both task types. The two groups did not differ in their latency switch costs in the mixed-task blocks.
First, this study was conducted using a non-clinical sample of undergraduate students. Second, the antisaccade task measures primarily oculomotor inhibition. Third, this study did not include the measure of state anxiety to rule out the effects of state anxiety on the present findings.
This study suggests that SA individuals demonstrate diminished efficiency of inhibition function but show no significant impairment of shifting function. However, in the mixed-task condition, SA individuals may exhibit an overall reduction in processing efficiency due to the higher task difficulty.
最近有人认为注意力控制在与威胁相关的注意偏向和社交焦虑的产生及维持中起关键作用。本研究旨在调查社交焦虑(SA)个体在注意力控制功能方面是否存在缺陷,尤其是在抑制和转换方面。
42名SA参与者和41名非焦虑(NA)参与者完成了一项混合性反扫视任务,这是反扫视任务的一种变体,用于研究抑制和转换功能。
结果显示,总体而言,SA参与者的反扫视潜伏期比NA参与者长,但两组在反扫视错误率上没有差异。此外,在单任务块中,SA参与者在反扫视试验中的潜伏期比NA参与者长,但在顺向扫视试验中并非如此。在混合任务块中,SA参与者在两种任务类型中的潜伏期都比NA参与者长。两组在混合任务块中的潜伏期切换成本没有差异。
第一,本研究是使用本科生非临床样本进行的。第二,反扫视任务主要测量眼动抑制。第三,本研究未包括状态焦虑的测量,以排除状态焦虑对本研究结果的影响。
本研究表明,SA个体表现出抑制功能效率降低,但转换功能无明显损害。然而,在混合任务条件下,由于任务难度较高,SA个体可能表现出总体加工效率降低。