Department of Radiology, Hôpital Erasme, Université libre de Bruxelles, 808 Route de Lennik, 1070.
Department of Pneumology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Saint-Pierre, Université libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium.
Acad Radiol. 2018 Dec;25(12):1533-1539. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2018.02.024. Epub 2018 Mar 20.
Computed tomography (CT) airways measurements can be used as surrogates to spirometric measurements for assessing bronchodilation in a particular patient with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Although spirometric measurements show variations within the opening hours of a hospital department, we aimed to compare the variability of CT airways measurements between morning and afternoon in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease to that of spirometric measurements.
Twenty patients had pulmonary function tests and CT around 8 am and 4 pm. Luminal area (LA) and wall thickness (WT) of third and fourth generation airways were measured twice by three readers. The percentage of airway area occupied by the wall (WA%) and the square root of wall area at an internal perimeter of 10 mm (√WAPi10) were calculated. The effects of examination time, reader, and measurement session on CT airways measurements were assessed, and the variability of these measurements was compared to that of spirometric measurements.
Variability of LA and LA was greater than that of spirometric measurements (P values ranging from <.001 to .033). There was no examination time effect on √WAPi10, WT, LA, or WA% (P values ranging from .102 to .712). There was a reader effect on all CT airways measurements (P values ranging from <.001 to .028), except in WT (P> .999). There was no effect of measurement session on any CT airway measurement (P values ranging from .535 to >.999).
As the variability of LA and LA is greater than that of spirometric measurements, clinical studies should include cohorts with larger numbers of patients when considering LA than when considering spirometric measurements as end points.
计算机断层扫描(CT)气道测量可作为评估慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者支气管扩张的替代指标,与肺活量计测量结果相比。尽管肺活量计测量结果在医院科室开放时间内存在差异,但我们旨在比较慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者 CT 气道测量的清晨和下午之间的变异性与肺活量计测量结果的变异性。
20 名患者在上午 8 点和下午 4 点左右进行了肺功能测试和 CT。由 3 位读者对第三和第四代气道的内腔面积(LA)和壁厚度(WT)进行了两次测量。气道壁面积百分比(WA%)和 10mm 内周壁面积平方根(√WAPi10)的计算。评估了检查时间、读者和测量时间对 CT 气道测量的影响,并将这些测量的变异性与肺活量计测量的变异性进行了比较。
LA 和 LA 的变异性大于肺活量计测量结果(P 值范围从<.001 到<.033)。√WAPi10、WT、LA 或 WA% 不受检查时间的影响(P 值范围从.102 到.712)。所有 CT 气道测量结果均存在读者效应(P 值范围从<.001 到<.028),除了 WT(P>.999)。任何 CT 气道测量均不受测量时间的影响(P 值范围从.535 到>.999)。
由于 LA 和 LA 的变异性大于肺活量计测量结果,因此在考虑 LA 作为终点时,临床研究应包括更多患者的队列,而不是考虑肺活量计测量结果。