School of Psychology, University of Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
Br J Psychol. 2018 Nov;109(4):830-849. doi: 10.1111/bjop.12299. Epub 2018 Mar 24.
The Serial Reaction Time Task (SRTT) is thought to assess implicit learning, which seems to be preserved with age. However, the reaction time (RT) measures employed on implicit-like tasks might be too unreliable to detect individual differences. We investigated whether RT-based measures mask age effects by comparing the performance of 43 younger and 35 older adults on SRTT and an explicit-like Predictive Sequence Learning Task (PSLT). RT-based measures (difference scores and a ratio) were collected for both tasks, and accuracy was additionally measured for PSLT. We also measured fluid abilities. The RT-difference scores indicated preserved SRTT and PSLT performance with age and did not correlate with fluid abilities, while ratio RT and the accuracy-based measures indicated age-related decline and correlated with fluid abilities. Therefore, RT-difference scores might mask individual differences, which compromises the interpretation of previous studies using SRTT.
序列反应时任务(SRTT)被认为可以评估内隐学习,而内隐学习似乎随着年龄的增长而保持不变。然而,在类似内隐的任务中使用的反应时(RT)测量可能太不可靠,无法检测个体差异。我们通过比较 43 名年轻成年人和 35 名老年成年人在 SRTT 和外显样预测序列学习任务(PSLT)上的表现,研究了基于 RT 的测量是否掩盖了年龄效应。我们为这两个任务收集了基于 RT 的测量(差异分数和比率),并额外测量了 PSLT 的准确性。我们还测量了流体能力。RT 差异分数表明 SRTT 和 PSLT 的表现随年龄而保持不变,并且与流体能力无关,而比率 RT 和基于准确性的测量则表明与年龄相关的下降,并且与流体能力相关。因此,RT 差异分数可能掩盖了个体差异,这影响了以前使用 SRTT 的研究的解释。