Ghosh-Swaby Olivia R, Tan Mary, Bagai Akshay, Yan Andrew T, Goodman Shaun G, Mehta Shamir R, Fisher Harold N, Cohen Eric A, Huynh Thao, Cantor Warren J, Le May Michel R, Déry Jean-Pierre, Welsh Robert C, Udell Jacob A
Cardiovascular Division, Department of Medicine and Women's College Research Institute, Women's College Hospital, Toronto, Ontario.
Faculty of Medical Science, Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, Western University, London, Ontario.
Clin Cardiol. 2018 Mar;41(3):285-292. doi: 10.1002/clc.22901. Epub 2018 Mar 25.
While divorced or living alone, patients with stable cardiovascular disease are at increased risk for adverse cardiovascular events. The importance of marital status following a myocardial infarction (MI) is less clear. We hypothesized that marital status may affect cardiovascular outcomes following MI. We analyzed outcomes among patients with MI who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention from the Canadian Observational Antiplatelet Study (COAPT). Marital status was categorized into 3 groups: married/common-law patients living together; never married; and divorced, separated, or widowed patients. Patients were followed for 15 months and our primary outcome was the occurrence of a major adverse cardiovascular event (MACE), defined as a composite of mortality, repeat acute MI, stroke, or urgent coronary revascularization. Multivariable logistic regression models were performed, with married/common-law patients living together considered the reference group. Among 2100 patients included in analyses, 1519 (72.3%) were married/common-law patients living together, 358 (17.1%) were separated/divorced/widowed, and 223 (10.6%) patients were never married. Dual antiplatelet therapy use after 15 months was similar across groups (75.4%, 77.8%, and 73.6%, respectively). The risk of MACE after 15 months was similar among married patients living together (12.7%; referent) compared with patients who were never married (13.9%; adjusted odds ratio: 1.09, 95% confidence interval: 0.58-2.07, P = 0.79) and patients separated/divorced/widowed (14.3%; adjusted odds ratio: 0.71, 95% confidence interval: 0.40-1.25, P = 0.23). Similarly, the risk of individual endpoints, including mortality, was similar across the 3 groups. Among patients stabilized following an MI, we found no association between marital status and 15-month outcomes.
在离婚或独居时,患有稳定型心血管疾病的患者发生不良心血管事件的风险会增加。心肌梗死(MI)后婚姻状况的重要性尚不太明确。我们假设婚姻状况可能会影响心肌梗死后的心血管结局。我们分析了来自加拿大观察性抗血小板研究(COAPT)中接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的心肌梗死患者的结局。婚姻状况分为3组:已婚/同居的习惯法婚姻患者;从未结婚;以及离婚、分居或丧偶的患者。对患者进行了15个月的随访,我们的主要结局是发生主要不良心血管事件(MACE),定义为死亡、再次急性心肌梗死、中风或紧急冠状动脉血运重建的综合情况。进行了多变量逻辑回归模型分析,以已婚/同居的习惯法婚姻患者作为参照组。在纳入分析的2100例患者中,1519例(72.3%)为已婚/同居的习惯法婚姻患者,358例(17.1%)为分居/离婚/丧偶患者,223例(10.6%)患者从未结婚。15个月后双联抗血小板治疗的使用率在各组中相似(分别为75.4%、77.8%和73.6%)。与从未结婚的患者(13.9%;调整后的优势比:1.09,95%置信区间:0.58 - 2.07,P = 0.79)以及分居/离婚/丧偶的患者(14.3%;调整后的优势比:0.71,95%置信区间:0.40 - 1.25,P = 0.23)相比,已婚/同居的习惯法婚姻患者15个月后发生MACE的风险相似(12.7%;参照组)。同样,包括死亡率在内的各个终点的风险在这3组中相似。在心肌梗死后病情稳定的患者中,我们发现婚姻状况与15个月的结局之间没有关联。