Suppr超能文献

在法医精神健康评估中利用互联网获取辅助信息。

Using the Internet for collateral information in forensic mental health evaluations.

作者信息

Pirelli Gianni, Hartigan Sara, Zapf Patricia A

机构信息

Pirelli Clinical and Forensic Psychology, LLC, Verona, NJ, USA.

John Jay College of Criminal Justice (CUNY), New York, NY, USA.

出版信息

Behav Sci Law. 2018 Mar;36(2):157-169. doi: 10.1002/bsl.2334. Epub 2018 Mar 25.

Abstract

There is a burgeoning literature regarding using Internet-based data in employment, university admissions, and healthcare settings, but such pertaining to forensic mental health assessment (FMHA) contexts is only beginning to develop and professional ethics codes have yet to address these issues in depth. We present the first empirical investigation of mental health and related professionals' (n = 139) attitudes and practices regarding using Internet data in forensic and therapeutic contexts. Respondents reported their experiences and levels of agreement with items measuring beliefs and attitudes toward using Internet-based data in various professional situations (e.g., 23% have searched the Internet for information about a therapy client, 39% for a forensic examinee, and only 26% opposed the practice for forensic evaluators). They also reported high levels of collective agreement, including feeling that there is a lack of guidance available from professional resources regarding Internet-related issues. Implications for forensic practice and research are presented.

摘要

关于在就业、大学招生和医疗环境中使用基于互联网的数据,有大量不断涌现的文献,但涉及法医心理健康评估(FMHA)背景的此类文献才刚刚开始发展,专业伦理准则尚未深入探讨这些问题。我们首次对心理健康及相关专业人员(n = 139)在法医和治疗背景下使用互联网数据的态度和做法进行了实证研究。受访者报告了他们的经历以及对衡量在各种专业情境中对使用基于互联网的数据的信念和态度的项目的认同程度(例如,23%的人曾在互联网上搜索有关治疗客户的信息,39%的人搜索过法医检查对象的信息,而只有26%的人反对法医评估人员这样做)。他们还报告了高度的集体认同,包括感觉专业资源在互联网相关问题上缺乏指导。文中呈现了对法医实践和研究的启示。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验