Suppr超能文献

经皮热消融治疗心脏旁肝肿瘤的安全性和有效性

Safety and Efficacy of Percutaneous Thermal Ablation of Juxta-Cardiac Hepatic Tumours.

作者信息

Kwan Justin, Appuhamy Chinthaka, Lim Gavin Hock Tai, Huang Ivan Kuang Hsin, Quek Lawrence, Pua Uei

机构信息

Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Tan Tock Seng Hospital, 11 Jalan Tan Tock Seng, Singapore, 308433, Singapore.

Neurotrauma Centre, National Hospital of Sri Lanka, E W Perera Mawatha, Colombo, 00700, Sri Lanka.

出版信息

Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2018 Jun;41(6):920-927. doi: 10.1007/s00270-018-1938-8. Epub 2018 Mar 26.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

To evaluate the safety and efficacy of percutaneous thermal ablation of liver tumours in a juxta-cardiac (JC) location.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

From January 2010 to December 2014, out of 274 cases of hepatic ablation, 33 consecutive patients who received thermal ablation (radiofrequency or microwave) to left hepatic lobe tumours were included in this study. Patients were divided into two groups: JC or non-juxta-cardiac (NJC) (tumour margin ≤ 10 mm or > 10 mm from the cardiac border, respectively). Imaging follow-up was performed at 6-week and 3-monthly intervals. Technical success, 30-day complications and local tumour control/recurrence were recorded. Statistical analysis was performed with t test and Fisher's test. Univariate and multivariate survival analyses were performed using Cox regression.

RESULTS

Patients comprised of 23 men and 10 women (mean age 67.0 years). Mean tumour size was 2.2 ± 0.9 cm (28 hepatocellular carcinoma and 5 metastases). Mean follow-up time was 21.2 months (range 2-72 months). There were no differences between the JC and NJC groups in the rates of complete ablation (86.7 vs 83.3% P = 1.0), tumour recurrence (20.0 vs 22.2%, P = 0.95) or complication rates (6.7 vs 11.1% P = 1.0). Metastatic lesions were associated with a higher rate of recurrent disease (hazard ratio 3.86, 95% CI 1.0-14.8%, P = 0.05).

DISCUSSION

Percutaneous thermal ablation of JC tumours has similar rates of local tumour control and safety profile when compared to tumours in a NJC location. Tumours in a JC location should not be considered a contraindication for thermal ablation.

摘要

引言

评估经皮热消融治疗近心(JC)部位肝肿瘤的安全性和有效性。

材料与方法

2010年1月至2014年12月,在274例肝消融病例中,本研究纳入了33例接受左肝叶肿瘤热消融(射频或微波)的连续患者。患者分为两组:JC组或非近心(NJC)组(肿瘤边缘分别距心脏边界≤10 mm或>10 mm)。分别在6周和3个月的间隔时间进行影像学随访。记录技术成功率、30天并发症以及局部肿瘤控制/复发情况。采用t检验和Fisher检验进行统计学分析。使用Cox回归进行单因素和多因素生存分析。

结果

患者包括23名男性和10名女性(平均年龄67.0岁)。平均肿瘤大小为2.2±0.9 cm(28例肝细胞癌和5例转移瘤)。平均随访时间为21.2个月(范围2 - 72个月)。JC组和NJC组在完全消融率(86.7%对83.3%,P = 1.0)、肿瘤复发率(20.0%对22.2%,P = 0.95)或并发症发生率(6.7%对11.1%,P = 1.0)方面无差异。转移瘤与更高的疾病复发率相关(风险比3.86,95%可信区间1.0 - 14.8%,P = 0.05)。

讨论

与NJC部位的肿瘤相比,经皮热消融治疗JC部位肿瘤的局部肿瘤控制率和安全性相似。JC部位的肿瘤不应被视为热消融的禁忌证。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验