Joshi Abhishek, Wragg Andrew
Barts and The London NHS Trust, Bart's Heart Centre, St Bartholomew's Hospital, London, UK.
Interv Cardiol. 2016 May;11(1):70-73. doi: 10.15420/icr.2016.11.1.70.
Simulator training in interventional cardiology is becoming a central part of early career acquisition of technical and non-technical skills. Its use is now mandated by national training organisations. Haptic simulators, part-task trainers, immersive environments and simulated patients can provide benchmarked, reproducible and safe opportunities for trainees to develop without exposing patients to the learning curve. However, whilst enthusiasm persists and trainee-centred evidence has been encouraging, simulation does not yet have a clear link to improved clinical outcomes. In this article we describe the range of simulation options, review the evidence for their efficacy in training and discuss the delivery of training in technical skills as well as human factor training and crisis resource management. We also review the future direction and barriers to the progression of simulation training.
介入心脏病学的模拟训练正成为早期职业生涯中获取技术和非技术技能的核心部分。目前,国家培训组织已强制要求使用模拟训练。触觉模拟器、部分任务训练器、沉浸式环境和模拟患者可为学员提供标准化、可重复且安全的机会,使其能够在不使患者承受学习曲线影响的情况下得到发展。然而,尽管热情持续高涨,且以学员为中心的证据也令人鼓舞,但模拟训练与改善临床结果之间尚未建立明确的联系。在本文中,我们描述了模拟训练的各种选择,回顾了其在培训中有效性的证据,并讨论了技术技能培训以及人为因素培训和危机资源管理的培训方式。我们还审视了模拟训练的未来方向和发展障碍。