• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

展望未来:2020年,哪些患者将接受经导管主动脉瓣置入术(TAVI)或外科主动脉瓣置换术(SAVR)?

A Glimpse into the Future: In 2020, Which Patients will Undergo TAVI or SAVR?

作者信息

O'Sullivan Crochan J, Wenaweser Peter

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, Stadtspital Triemli, Zurich, Switzerland.

Department of Cardiology, University Hospital Bern, Inselspital, Switzerland.

出版信息

Interv Cardiol. 2017 May;12(1):44-50. doi: 10.15420/icr.2016:24:2.

DOI:10.15420/icr.2016:24:2
PMID:29588730
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5808624/
Abstract

Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) has evolved into a safe and effective procedure to treat symptomatic patients with severe aortic stenosis (AS), with predictable and reproducible results. Rates of important complications such as vascular complications, strokes and paravalvular leaks are lower than ever, because of improved patient selection, systematic use of multidector computer tomography, increasing operator experience and device iteration. Accumulating data suggest that transfemoral TAVI with newer generation transcatheter heart valves and delivery systems is superior to conventional surgical aortic valve replacement among intermediate- and high-risk patients with severe symptomatic AS with regard to all-cause mortality and stroke. One can anticipate that by 2020, the majority of patients with severe symptomatic AS will undergo TAVI as first line therapy, regardless of surgical risk.

摘要

经导管主动脉瓣植入术(TAVI)已发展成为一种安全有效的治疗有症状的严重主动脉瓣狭窄(AS)患者的方法,其结果具有可预测性和可重复性。由于患者选择的改善、多排计算机断层扫描的系统应用、术者经验的增加以及器械的迭代,血管并发症、中风和瓣周漏等重要并发症的发生率比以往任何时候都低。越来越多的数据表明,对于有严重症状的中高危AS患者,使用新一代经导管心脏瓣膜和输送系统进行经股动脉TAVI在全因死亡率和中风方面优于传统外科主动脉瓣置换术。可以预计,到2020年,大多数有严重症状的AS患者将接受TAVI作为一线治疗,而不论手术风险如何。

相似文献

1
A Glimpse into the Future: In 2020, Which Patients will Undergo TAVI or SAVR?展望未来:2020年,哪些患者将接受经导管主动脉瓣置入术(TAVI)或外科主动脉瓣置换术(SAVR)?
Interv Cardiol. 2017 May;12(1):44-50. doi: 10.15420/icr.2016:24:2.
2
Updated clinical indications for transcatheter aortic valve implantation in patients with severe aortic stenosis: expert opinion of the Italian Society of Cardiology and GISE.经导管主动脉瓣植入术治疗严重主动脉瓣狭窄患者的更新临床适应证:意大利心脏病学会和 GISE 的专家意见。
J Cardiovasc Med (Hagerstown). 2018 May;19(5):197-210. doi: 10.2459/JCM.0000000000000636.
3
Exploring the Difference in Post-procedural Stroke Rates Between Patients with Aortic Stenosis Who Undergo Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Versus Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement.探索接受经导管主动脉瓣置换术与外科主动脉瓣置换术的主动脉瓣狭窄患者术后中风发生率的差异。
Cureus. 2018 Apr 17;10(4):e2494. doi: 10.7759/cureus.2494.
4
Transcatheter aortic valve implantation vs. surgical aortic valve replacement for treatment of severe aortic stenosis: a meta-analysis of randomized trials.经导管主动脉瓣植入术与外科主动脉瓣置换术治疗重度主动脉瓣狭窄的比较:随机试验的荟萃分析。
Eur Heart J. 2016 Dec 14;37(47):3503-3512. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehw225. Epub 2016 Jul 7.
5
Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation in Intermediate Surgical Risk Patients With Severe Aortic Stenosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.严重主动脉瓣狭窄且手术风险中等的患者经导管主动脉瓣植入术:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
Heart Lung Circ. 2018 Feb;27(2):227-234. doi: 10.1016/j.hlc.2017.02.032. Epub 2017 Apr 12.
6
[Outcome comparison of different therapy procedures in surgical high-risk elderly patients with severe aortic stenosis].[外科高危老年重度主动脉瓣狭窄患者不同治疗方法的疗效比较]
Zhonghua Xin Xue Guan Bing Za Zhi. 2017 Jan 25;45(1):13-18. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0253-3758.2017.01.004.
7
Challenges When Expanding Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation to Younger Patients.将经导管主动脉瓣植入术扩展至较年轻患者时面临的挑战。
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2018 May 11;5:45. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2018.00045. eCollection 2018.
8
Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation Versus Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.经导管主动脉瓣植入术与外科主动脉瓣置换术:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Ann Intern Med. 2016 Sep 6;165(5):334-44. doi: 10.7326/M16-0060. Epub 2016 Jun 7.
9
Cost-effectiveness of transcatheter aortic valve implantation compared to surgical aortic valve replacement in the intermediate surgical risk population.经导管主动脉瓣植入术与外科主动脉瓣置换术治疗中危外科手术风险人群的成本效益比较。
Int J Cardiol. 2019 Nov 1;294:17-22. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2019.06.057. Epub 2019 Jun 21.
10
Valve in valve transcatheter aortic valve implantation (ViV-TAVI) versus redo-Surgical aortic valve replacement (redo-SAVR): A systematic review and meta-analysis.经导管主动脉瓣置入术(ViV-TAVI)中的瓣中瓣技术与再次外科主动脉瓣置换术(redo-SAVR):一项系统评价和荟萃分析
J Interv Cardiol. 2018 Oct;31(5):661-671. doi: 10.1111/joic.12520. Epub 2018 May 20.

引用本文的文献

1
A systematic review and meta-analysis of the hemodynamics and outcomes of the Myval balloon-expandable valve in patients with severe aortic stenosis and with aortic regurgitation.对严重主动脉瓣狭窄合并主动脉瓣反流患者中Myval球囊扩张瓣膜的血流动力学及预后的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Int J Cardiol Heart Vasc. 2025 Mar 6;58:101641. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcha.2025.101641. eCollection 2025 Jun.
2
Pakistan Following Foot Prints of Developed World in Structural Interventions: Experience of Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation Reported First Time.巴基斯坦在结构性干预方面追随发达国家脚步:首次报道经导管主动脉瓣植入经验。
Cureus. 2020 Nov 16;12(11):e11497. doi: 10.7759/cureus.11497.
3
Ten-year experience with transcatheter and surgical aortic valve replacement in Finland.芬兰经导管主动脉瓣置换术和外科主动脉瓣置换术的 10 年经验。
Ann Med. 2019 May-Jun;51(3-4):270-279. doi: 10.1080/07853890.2019.1614657. Epub 2019 May 21.

本文引用的文献

1
One-Year Clinical Outcomes With SAPIEN 3 Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement in High-Risk and Inoperable Patients With Severe Aortic Stenosis.高危及无法手术的重度主动脉瓣狭窄患者使用SAPIEN 3经导管主动脉瓣置换术的一年临床结局
Circulation. 2016 Jul 12;134(2):130-40. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.116.022797.
2
Transcatheter aortic valve implantation vs. surgical aortic valve replacement for treatment of severe aortic stenosis: a meta-analysis of randomized trials.经导管主动脉瓣植入术与外科主动脉瓣置换术治疗重度主动脉瓣狭窄的比较:随机试验的荟萃分析。
Eur Heart J. 2016 Dec 14;37(47):3503-3512. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehw225. Epub 2016 Jul 7.
3
Early clinical and echocardiographic outcomes after SAPIEN 3 transcatheter aortic valve replacement in inoperable, high-risk and intermediate-risk patients with aortic stenosis.SAPIEN 3经导管主动脉瓣置换术应用于无法手术、高危和中危主动脉瓣狭窄患者后的早期临床及超声心动图结果
Eur Heart J. 2016 Jul 21;37(28):2252-62. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehw112. Epub 2016 Mar 31.
4
Outcomes of transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve implantation at hospitals with and without on-site cardiac surgery department: insights from the prospective German aortic valve replacement quality assurance registry (AQUA) in 17 919 patients.经股动脉入路主动脉瓣置换术在有和无心脏外科手术部的医院的结局:来自前瞻性德国主动脉瓣置换质量保证登记(AQUA)在 17919 例患者中的研究结果。
Eur Heart J. 2016 Jul 21;37(28):2240-8. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehw190. Epub 2016 May 17.
5
Transcatheter aortic valve replacement versus surgical valve replacement in intermediate-risk patients: a propensity score analysis.经导管主动脉瓣置换术与外科瓣膜置换术治疗中危患者的效果比较:倾向评分分析。
Lancet. 2016 May 28;387(10034):2218-25. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)30073-3. Epub 2016 Apr 3.
6
Natural History, Diagnostic Approaches, and Therapeutic Strategies for Patients With Asymptomatic Severe Aortic Stenosis.无症状严重主动脉瓣狭窄患者的自然病史、诊断方法和治疗策略。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016 May 17;67(19):2263-2288. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2016.02.057. Epub 2016 Apr 2.
7
Transcatheter or Surgical Aortic-Valve Replacement in Intermediate-Risk Patients.经导管主动脉瓣置换术或外科主动脉瓣置换术治疗中危患者。
N Engl J Med. 2016 Apr 28;374(17):1609-20. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1514616. Epub 2016 Apr 2.
8
Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement 2016: A Modern-Day "Through the Looking-Glass" Adventure.经导管主动脉瓣置换 2016:一场现代版“爱丽丝镜中奇遇记”。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016 Mar 29;67(12):1472-1487. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2015.12.059.
9
Transcatheter aortic valve implantation today and tomorrow.
Swiss Med Wkly. 2016 Mar 21;146:w14299. doi: 10.4414/smw.2016.14299. eCollection 2016.
10
Expanding Indications of Transcatheter Heart Valve Interventions.经导管心脏瓣膜介入治疗适应证的扩展。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2015 Dec 21;8(14):1777-96. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2015.08.015.