Suppr超能文献

A comparison of the effects of carbon dioxide and medical air for abdominal insufflation on respiratory parameters in xylazine-sedated sheep undergoing laparoscopic artificial insemination.

作者信息

Haan J D, Hay Kraus B L, Sathe S R

机构信息

a Department of Veterinary Clinical Sciences , College of Veterinary Medicine , Iowa State University, Ames, IA , USA.

出版信息

N Z Vet J. 2018 Jul;66(4):167-171. doi: 10.1080/00480169.2018.1458661. Epub 2018 Apr 25.

Abstract

AIMS

To determine if abdominal insufflation with medical air will improve oxygenation and ventilation parameters when compared to insufflation with CO in xylazine-sedated sheep undergoing laparoscopic artificial insemination (AI).

METHODS

Forty-seven sheep underwent oestrus synchronisation and were fasted for 24 hours prior to laparoscopic AI. Each animal was randomised to receive either CO or medical air for abdominal insufflation. An auricular arterial catheter was placed and utilised for serial blood sampling. Respiratory rates (RR) and arterial blood samples were collected at baseline, after xylazine (0.1 mg/kg I/V) sedation, 2 minutes after Trendelenburg positioning, 5 minutes after abdominal insufflation, and 10 minutes after being returned to a standing position. Blood samples were collected in heparinised syringes, stored on ice, and analysed for arterial pH, partial pressure of arterial O (PaO), and CO (PaCO). The number of ewes conceiving to AI was also determined.

RESULTS

Repeated measures ANOVA demonstrated temporal effects on RR, PaO, PaCO and arterial pH during the laparoscopic AI procedure (p<0.001), but no difference between insufflation groups (p>0.01). No sheep experienced hypercapnia (PaCO>50 mmHg) or acidaemia (pH<7.35). Hypoxaemia (PaO<70 mmHg) was diagnosed during the procedure in 14/22 (64%) ewes in the CO group compared with 8/23 (35%) ewes in the medical air group (p=0.053). Overall, 15/20 (75%) ewes in the CO group conceived to AI compared with 16/22 (72.7%) in the medical air group (p=0.867).

CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE

There were no statistical or clinical differences in RR, PaO, PaCO, pH, or conception to AI when comparing the effects of CO and medical air as abdominal insufflation gases. None of the sheep experienced hypercapnia or acidaemic, yet 42% (19/45) of sheep developed clinical hypoxaemia, with a higher percentage of ewes in the CO group developing hypoxaemia than in the medical air group. Based on the overall analysis, medical air could be utilised as a comparable alternative for abdominal insufflation during laparoscopic AI procedures.

摘要

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验