Gangopadhyay Ishanti, McDonald Margarethe, Ellis Weismer Susan, Kaushanskaya Margarita
Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, United States.
Waisman Center, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, United States.
Front Psychol. 2018 Mar 14;9:323. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00323. eCollection 2018.
We examined the role of verbal mediation in planning performance of English-Spanish-speaking bilingual children and monolingual English-speaking children, between the ages of 9 and 12 years. To measure planning, children were administered the Tower of London (ToL) task. In a dual-task paradigm, children completed ToL problems under three conditions: with no secondary task (baseline), with articulatory suppression, and with non-verbal motor suppression. Analyses revealed generally shorter planning times for bilinguals than monolinguals but both groups performed similarly on number of moves and execution times. Additionally, bilingual children were more efficient at planning throughout the duration of the task while monolingual children showed significant gains with more practice. Children's planning times under articulatory suppression were significantly shorter than under motor suppression as well as the baseline condition, and there was no difference in planning times between monolingual and bilingual children during articulatory suppression. These results demonstrate that bilingualism influences performance on a complex EF measure like planning, and that these effects are not related to verbal mediation.
我们研究了言语中介在9至12岁的英-西班牙语双语儿童和单语英语儿童计划执行能力中的作用。为了测量计划能力,我们让儿童完成伦敦塔(ToL)任务。在双任务范式中,儿童在三种条件下完成ToL问题:无次要任务(基线)、有发音抑制和有非言语运动抑制。分析显示,双语儿童的计划时间总体上比单语儿童短,但两组在移动次数和执行时间上表现相似。此外,双语儿童在整个任务过程中计划效率更高,而单语儿童随着练习增多有显著进步。发音抑制条件下儿童的计划时间明显短于运动抑制条件以及基线条件,并且在发音抑制期间,单语和双语儿童的计划时间没有差异。这些结果表明,双语会影响像计划这样的复杂执行功能测量的表现,并且这些影响与言语中介无关。