1 Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore , Singapore .
2 Department of Pathology, National University of Singapore , Singapore .
Thyroid. 2018 Apr;28(4):511-521. doi: 10.1089/thy.2017.0274. Epub 2018 Mar 29.
Although The Bethesda System for Reporting Thyroid Cytopathology has provided clinicians with a standardized classification scheme for the diagnosis of thyroid fine-needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) specimens, the indeterminate categories of Bethesda III (B3)-atypia of undetermined significance/follicular lesion of undetermined significance (AUS/FLUS)-and Bethesda IV (B4)-follicular neoplasm/suspicious for follicular neoplasm (FN/SFN)-continue to pose challenges with regards to ideal diagnostic and therapeutic management. Having previously demonstrated the presence of nuclear atypia as a high-risk subgroup in B3, the objective of this study was to evaluate the malignancy rates in the B4 subgroup with nuclear atypia.
A retrospective review of all thyroid FNACs diagnosed as B4 (FN/SFN) between 2008 and 2015 was conducted at a tertiary referral center in Singapore. Data on patient demographics, sonographic features, and final histological diagnosis were collected. This was compared to data from a previous analysis on all nodules diagnosed as B3 (AUS/FLUS) over a similar period.
A total of 137/309 (44.3%) and 88/111 (79.3%) FNACs diagnosed as B3 and B4, respectively, underwent surgical excision yielding final histopathological diagnoses. The malignancy rate of B4 was 31/88 (35.2%) compared to B3, which was 37/137 (27.0%). Subclassification based on the presence of architectural versus nuclear atypia showed significantly higher malignancy rates in B4 nodules with nuclear atypia (21.8% vs. 57.6%; p < 0.01). These findings corroborate previous results within the B3 category (malignancy rate of 14.7% vs. 36.8%; p < 0.01). The only sonographic features predictive of malignancy were the presence of macrocalcifications in B4 compared to irregularity of margins in B3.
The presence of nuclear atypia identifies subgroups with significant differential malignancy risks within both the B3 and B4 categories. This supports the notion that subclassification is a useful risk stratification tool that can guide diagnostic and therapeutic management of indeterminate thyroid nodules with heterogenous risk profiles.
虽然《甲状腺细胞病理学报告的贝塞斯达系统》为临床医生诊断甲状腺细针抽吸细胞学(FNAC)标本提供了标准化的分类方案,但贝塞斯达系统的不确定类别 3(B3)——意义不明确的非典型性/滤泡性病变不明确(AUS/FLUS)和贝塞斯达系统 4(B4)——滤泡性肿瘤/疑似滤泡性肿瘤(FN/SFN)——在理想的诊断和治疗管理方面仍然存在挑战。先前已经证明 B3 中的核异型性是一个高风险亚组,本研究的目的是评估 B4 亚组中具有核异型性的恶性肿瘤发生率。
在新加坡的一家三级转诊中心,对 2008 年至 2015 年间诊断为 B4(FN/SFN)的所有甲状腺 FNAC 进行了回顾性分析。收集了患者的人口统计学、超声特征和最终组织学诊断的数据。这与同一时期所有诊断为 B3(AUS/FLUS)的结节的先前分析数据进行了比较。
共有 137/309(44.3%)和 88/111(79.3%)的 FNAC 分别诊断为 B3 和 B4,进行了手术切除,得出最终的组织病理学诊断。B4 的恶性肿瘤发生率为 31/88(35.2%),而 B3 为 37/137(27.0%)。基于结构异型性与核异型性的分类显示,具有核异型性的 B4 结节的恶性肿瘤发生率明显更高(21.8%比 57.6%;p<0.01)。这些发现与 B3 分类中的先前结果一致(恶性肿瘤发生率为 14.7%比 36.8%;p<0.01)。唯一可预测恶性肿瘤的超声特征是 B4 中有大钙化,而 B3 则是边缘不规则。
核异型性的存在确定了 B3 和 B4 两个类别中具有显著差异恶性风险的亚组。这支持了亚分类是一种有用的风险分层工具的观点,它可以指导具有不同风险特征的不确定甲状腺结节的诊断和治疗管理。