An comparison of the fracture resistance of standard and modified mesio-occluso-distal cavity designs restored with resin composite restoration.

OBJECTIVES

The main goal of this study was to evaluate the fracture resistance of maxillary second premolar teeth with standard and conservative mesio-occluso-distal (MOD) cavity designs.

METHODS

Sixty maxillary second premolars were randomly divided into 6 Groups of 10 teeth. G1 consisted of intact teeth. G2 was prepared with separated proximal boxes that were designed to be 1 mm approximately above the cement-enamel junction for the cervical margins. The occlusal outline of the proximal was performed as approximately half of the intercuspal distance buccolingually and one-third of the mesiodistal dimension. The proximal preparation was standardized in all tested groups. G3 was prepared with an occlusal extension that extended approximately one-third of buccolingual width and 2 mm in depth. G4 was prepared with the occlusal extension of 1mm in depth and width. G5: The occlusal extension was 1mm in depth and 2 mm in width. G6: The occlusal extension was 2 mm in depth and 1 mm in width. Samples were restored with composite resin and subjected to load to failure test to evaluate the fracture resistance.

RESULTS

G1 showed the highest fracture resistance value (1737.1 N) while G3 had the lowest mean value (522.9 N). Furthermore, the fracture resistance of G4 and G5 was significantly higher than G3 and G6 ( < 0.05), where in both groups, the preparation of the occlusal extension mostly remained in the enamel layer.

CONCLUSION

Modified MOD cavity designs with 1 mm depth in the enamel layer have significantly higher fracture resistance than the standard MOD cavity.