Aix Marseille Université, IRD, AP-HM, MEPHI, IHU Méditerranée Infection, Marseille, France.
Laboratoire de Bactériologie, Hôpital L'archet 2, CHU de Nice, Nice, France; INSERM U1065, Centre Méditerranéen de Médecine Moléculaire, Equipe 6, Nice, France; Faculté de Médecine, Université Côte d'Azur, Nice, France.
Clin Microbiol Infect. 2018 Sep;24(9):935-943. doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2018.03.031. Epub 2018 Mar 29.
Administration of appropriate antimicrobial therapy is one of the key factors in surviving bloodstream infections. Blood culture is currently the reference standard for diagnosis, but conventional practices have long turnaround times while diagnosis needs to be faster to improve patient care. Phenotypic methods offer an advantage over genotypic methods in that they can identify a wide range of taxa, detect the resistance currently expressed, and resist genetic variability in resistance detection.
We aimed to discuss the wide array of phenotypic methods that have recently been developed to substantially reduce the time to result from identification to antibiotic susceptibility testing.
A literature review focusing on rapid phenotypic methods for improving the diagnosis of bloodstream infection was the source.
Rapid phenotypic bacterial identification corresponds to Matrix-assisted laser-desorption/ionization time of flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF), and rapid antimicrobial susceptibility testing methods comprised of numerous different approaches, are considered and critically assessed. Particular attention is also paid to emerging technologies knocking at the door of routine microbiology laboratories. Finally, workflow integration of these methods is considered.
The broad panel of phenotypic methods currently available enables healthcare institutions to draw up their own individual approach to improve bloodstream infection diagnosis but requires a thorough evaluation of their workflow integration. Clinical microbiology will probably move towards faster methods while maintaining a complex multi-method approach as there is no all-in-one method.
适当的抗菌治疗管理是存活于血流感染的关键因素之一。血培养目前是诊断的参考标准,但常规实践的周转时间较长,而诊断需要更快,以改善患者的护理。表型方法比基因型方法具有优势,因为它们可以识别广泛的分类群,检测当前表达的耐药性,并抵抗耐药性检测中的遗传变异性。
我们旨在讨论最近开发的各种表型方法,这些方法可以大大缩短从鉴定到抗生素敏感性测试的结果时间。
这是一篇专注于快速表型方法以改善血流感染诊断的文献综述。
快速表型细菌鉴定对应于基质辅助激光解吸/电离飞行时间质谱法(MALDI-TOF),而快速抗菌药物敏感性测试方法包括许多不同的方法,并进行了考虑和批判性评估。特别关注的是新兴技术正在敲开常规微生物学实验室的大门。最后,还考虑了这些方法的工作流程整合。
目前可用的广泛表型方法使医疗机构能够制定自己的个体化方法来改善血流感染的诊断,但需要对其工作流程整合进行彻底评估。临床微生物学可能会朝着更快的方法发展,同时保持复杂的多方法方法,因为没有一种方法可以解决所有问题。