Suppr超能文献

患者对影像学检出低危场景和期望干预阈值下乳腺癌风险的认知:一项多机构调查。

Patient Perceptions of Breast Cancer Risk in Imaging-Detected Low-Risk Scenarios and Thresholds for Desired Intervention: A Multi-Institution Survey.

机构信息

Department of Radiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina.

Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina.

出版信息

J Am Coll Radiol. 2018 Jun;15(6):911-919. doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2018.02.010. Epub 2018 Mar 30.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To determine women's perceptions of breast cancer risk and thresholds for desiring biopsy when considering BI-RADS 3 and 4A scenarios and recommendations, respectively.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Women presenting for screening mammography from five geographically diverse medical centers were surveyed. Demographic information and baseline anxiety were queried. Participants were presented with scenarios of short-term imaging follow-up recommendations (ie, BI-RADS 3) and biopsy recommendations (ie, BI-RADS 4A) for low-risk mammographic abnormalities and asked to estimate their breast cancer risk for each scenario. Participants reported the threshold (ie, likelihood of cancer) where they would feel comfortable undergoing short-term imaging follow-up and biopsy and their anticipated regret for choosing short-term follow-up versus biopsy.

RESULTS

Analysis of 2,747 surveys showed that participants estimated breast cancer risk of 32.8% for a BI-RADS 3 and 41.1% for a BI-RADS 4A scenarios are significantly greater rates than clinically established rates (<2% [P < .001] and 2%-10% [P < .001], respectively). Over one-half (55.4%) of participants reported they would never want imaging follow-up if there was any chance of cancer; two-thirds (66.2%) reported they would desire biopsy if there was any chance of cancer. Participants reported greater anticipated regret (P < .001) and less relief and confidence (P < .001) with the decision to undergo follow-up imaging versus biopsy.

CONCLUSION

Women overestimate breast cancer risk associated with both BI-RADS 3 and 4A scenarios and desire very low biopsy thresholds. Greater anticipated regret and less relief and confidence was reported with the choice to undergo short-term imaging follow-up compared with biopsy.

摘要

目的

分别在考虑 BI-RADS 3 和 4A 情况下,确定女性对乳腺癌风险的认知以及对进行活检的期望阈值。

材料和方法

从五个地理位置不同的医疗中心招募参加筛查性乳房 X 光检查的女性进行调查。询问了人口统计学信息和基线焦虑情况。向参与者展示了短期影像学随访(即 BI-RADS 3)和活检建议(即 BI-RADS 4A)的低风险乳房 X 光异常建议的情况,并要求他们为每个情况估计其乳腺癌风险。参与者报告了他们愿意接受短期影像学随访和活检的阈值(即癌症的可能性),以及选择短期随访与活检的预期后悔。

结果

对 2747 份调查的分析表明,参与者估计 BI-RADS 3 情况下的乳腺癌风险为 32.8%,BI-RADS 4A 情况下为 41.1%,这两个风险显著高于临床确定的风险(<2%[P<0.001]和 2%-10%[P<0.001])。超过一半(55.4%)的参与者表示,如果有任何癌症的可能,他们永远不会希望进行影像学随访;三分之二(66.2%)的人表示,如果有任何癌症的可能,他们希望进行活检。与选择进行随访影像学检查相比,参与者报告了更大的预期后悔(P<0.001)和较少的宽慰和信心(P<0.001)。

结论

女性高估了 BI-RADS 3 和 4A 情况下的乳腺癌风险,并期望非常低的活检阈值。与进行短期影像学随访相比,选择进行活检的预期后悔更大,而宽慰和信心更小。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验