a Department of Psychology, Faculty of Economics, Administrative and Social Sciences , MEF University , Istanbul , Turkey.
b Department of Psychology , University of Zurich , Zürich , Switzerland.
Memory. 2019 Jan;27(1):28-37. doi: 10.1080/09658211.2018.1458321. Epub 2018 Apr 1.
The consistency of earliest memories in content, dating, and memory qualities was investigated. A total of 84 (27 males; M = 24.93, SD = 1.36) adults reported earliest memories, estimated ages, and rated their recollections on memory qualities with a two-year time lag. At Time 2, their original reports at Time 1 were presented and they were asked to report whether the earliest memories they recalled at Time 2 were the same. Fifty-six per cent of the participants reported the same earliest memories and those remembering the same events had earlier memories than those remembering different ones. Although no significant differences were observed in estimated ages on the basis of mean ages, a predating bias of later memories and a tendency to postdate earlier memories were observed on the basis of a 48-month cut-off point. Thus, how the data is analysed is critical in detecting dating biases or errors affecting conclusions and interpretations about the dating consistency of earliest memories. Finally, memory qualities of earliest memories displayed a high level of consistency with a two-year time lag regardless of remembering the same versus different event.
本研究旨在调查最早记忆在内容、时间和记忆质量上的一致性。共有 84 名(27 名男性;M=24.93,SD=1.36)成年人报告了最早的记忆、估计年龄,并在两年的时间间隔后对记忆质量进行了评分。在时间 2,他们报告了时间 1 的原始报告,并被要求报告他们在时间 2 回忆的最早记忆是否相同。56%的参与者报告了相同的最早记忆,并且那些回忆相同事件的人比回忆不同事件的人更早地记住了这些事件。尽管根据平均年龄观察到估计年龄没有显著差异,但基于 48 个月的截止点,观察到了后记忆的前置偏差和前记忆的后置偏差趋势。因此,在检测影响关于最早记忆的时间一致性的结论和解释的时间偏差或错误时,分析数据的方式至关重要。最后,无论是否记住相同的事件,最早记忆的记忆质量在两年的时间间隔后都显示出高度的一致性。