Drayson Zoe
University of California, Davis, USA.
Stud Hist Philos Sci. 2018 Apr;68:80-87. doi: 10.1016/j.shpsa.2018.01.005. Epub 2018 Feb 1.
The neural vehicles of mental representation play an explanatory role in cognitive psychology that their realizers do not. Cognitive psychology individuates neural structures as representational vehicles in terms of the specific causal properties to which cognitive mechanisms are sensitive. Explanations that appeal to properties of vehicles can capture generalisations which are not available at the level of their neural realizers. In this paper, I argue that the individuation of realizers as vehicles restricts the sorts of explanations in which they can participate. I illustrate this with reference to Rupert's (2011) claim that representational vehicles can play an explanatory role in psychology in virtue of their quantity or proportion. I propose that such quantity-based explanatory claims can apply only to realizers and not to vehicles, in virtue of the particular causal role that vehicles play in psychological explanations.
心理表征的神经载体在认知心理学中发挥着一种其实现者所不具备的解释作用。认知心理学根据认知机制所敏感的特定因果属性,将神经结构个体化,使其成为表征载体。诉诸载体属性的解释能够捕捉到在其神经实现者层面无法获得的一般性规律。在本文中,我认为将实现者个体化作为载体限制了它们能够参与的解释类型。我以鲁珀特(2011)的观点为例进行说明,即表征载体因其数量或比例能够在心理学中发挥解释作用。我提出,鉴于载体在心理学解释中所起的特定因果作用,这种基于数量的解释性主张仅适用于实现者,而不适用于载体。