Sciacca L, Vella V, Frittitta L, Tumminia A, Manzella L, Squatrito S, Belfiore A, Vigneri R
Endocrinology Section, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Catania, Garibaldi-Nesima Hospital, via Palermo 636, 95122 Catania, Italy.
Endocrinology Section, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Catania, Garibaldi-Nesima Hospital, via Palermo 636, 95122 Catania, Italy; School of Human and Social Science, University "Kore" of Enna, Enna, Italy.
Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis. 2018 May;28(5):436-443. doi: 10.1016/j.numecd.2018.02.010. Epub 2018 Feb 24.
Hyperinsulinemia is a recognized risk factor for cancer and plays a major role for the increased cancer incidence in diabetic patients. Whether insulin analogs, and particularly long-acting analogs, worsen the pro-cancer effect of excess insulin is still controversial.
In this paper we summarize the biological bases for the potential detrimental effect of long-acting analogs on cancer cells and review the in vitro and in vivo evidence on this issue. Because of their different molecular structure relative to native insulin, insulin analogs may activate the insulin receptor (IR) and the post receptor pathways differently. Most, but not all, in vitro evidence indicate that long-acting analogs may have a stronger mitogenic potency than insulin on cancer cells. Notably insulin glargine, the most studied long-acting analog, also has a higher affinity for the insulin-like growth factor (IGF)-1 receptor, a potent growth mediator. In vitro observations, however, may not reflect what occurs in vivo when analogs are metabolized to derivatives with a different mitogenic activity. Clinical studies, mostly retrospective and predominantly concerning glargine, provide contrasting results. The only perspective trial found no cancer increase in patients treated with glargine. All these studies, however, have severe weaknesses because of the insufficient evaluation of important factors such as dose administered, length of exposure, patient follow-up duration and site-specific cancer investigation. Moreover, whether cancer promotion is a long-acting analog class characteristic or a specific effect of a single agent is not clear.
In conclusion the carcinogenic risk of long-acting analogs, and specifically glargine, can be neither confirmed nor excluded. A personalized and shared decision, considering all the individual risk factors (metabolic and non-metabolic), is the suggestion for the clinician.
高胰岛素血症是公认的癌症风险因素,在糖尿病患者癌症发病率增加中起主要作用。胰岛素类似物,尤其是长效类似物,是否会加剧过量胰岛素的促癌作用仍存在争议。
在本文中,我们总结了长效类似物对癌细胞潜在有害作用的生物学基础,并综述了关于此问题的体外和体内证据。由于胰岛素类似物相对于天然胰岛素具有不同的分子结构,它们可能以不同方式激活胰岛素受体(IR)和受体后途径。大多数(但并非全部)体外证据表明,长效类似物对癌细胞的促有丝分裂效力可能比胰岛素更强。值得注意的是,研究最多的长效类似物甘精胰岛素对胰岛素样生长因子(IGF)-1受体也具有更高的亲和力,IGF-1受体是一种强大的生长介质。然而,体外观察结果可能无法反映体内类似物代谢为具有不同促有丝分裂活性的衍生物时所发生的情况。临床研究大多为回顾性研究,且主要涉及甘精胰岛素,结果相互矛盾。唯一的前瞻性试验发现接受甘精胰岛素治疗的患者癌症发病率没有增加。然而,所有这些研究都存在严重缺陷,因为对诸如给药剂量、暴露时间、患者随访时长和特定部位癌症调查等重要因素的评估不足。此外,癌症促进作用是长效类似物类别的特征还是单一药物的特定作用尚不清楚。
总之,长效类似物,特别是甘精胰岛素的致癌风险既不能得到证实,也不能排除。建议临床医生综合考虑所有个体风险因素(代谢和非代谢因素),做出个性化且共同的决策。