• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

氟聚合物涂层支架与生物可降解和无聚合物支架的急性血栓形成。

Acute thrombogenicity of fluoropolymer-coated versus biodegradable and polymer-free stents.

机构信息

CVPath Institute, Inc., Gaithersburg, MD, USA.

出版信息

EuroIntervention. 2019 Mar 20;14(16):1685-1693. doi: 10.4244/EIJ-D-17-00728.

DOI:10.4244/EIJ-D-17-00728
PMID:29619983
Abstract

AIMS

Durable fluoropolymer-coated everolimus-eluting stents (FP-EES) have shown lower rates of stent thrombosis (ST) versus bare metal stents (BMS) and first-generation bioabsorbable polymer (BP) DES. The aim of the study was to evaluate the specific role of the FP in thromboresistance.

METHODS AND RESULTS

A total of 57 stents were assessed in three separate ex vivo swine arteriovenous shunt model experiments (first shunt experiment, custom-made fluoropolymer-coated BMS [FP-only] vs. BMS [n=8 each]; second shunt experiment, FP-EES vs. abluminally coated biodegradable polymer sirolimus-eluting stents [BP-SES] vs. BMS [n=8 each]; and third shunt experiment, FP-EES vs. polymer-free Biolimus A9-coated stents [PF-BCS] vs. BMS [n=6 each]). After one hour of circulation, stents were bisected, and each half was dual-immunostained using a platelet cocktail and a marker for inflammation. Antibody staining was visualised by confocal microscopy. In addition, stents were evaluated by scanning electron microscopy. FP-only stents showed significantly lower platelet adherence compared with BMS (% fluorescence-positive area: FP-only=1.8%, BMS=5.6%, p=0.047) with similar inflammatory cell density. FP-EES also demonstrated the lowest platelet adherence compared with BP-SES (p=0.056), PF-BCS (p=0.013) and BMS (p=0.003) with the significantly lowest inflammatory cell density.

CONCLUSIONS

Fluoropolymer coating imparts greater thromboresistance relative to BMS and to polymer-free DES designs, which reflects an unique phenomenon known as fluoropassivation, representing one proposed mechanism for clinically observed low ST rates in FP-EES.

摘要

目的

与金属裸支架(BMS)和第一代生物可吸收聚合物(BP)DES 相比,耐用型含氟聚合物涂层依维莫司洗脱支架(FP-EES)显示出较低的支架血栓形成(ST)发生率。本研究旨在评估 FP 在抗血栓形成方面的特定作用。

方法和结果

在三个独立的体外猪动静脉分流模型实验中评估了 57 个支架(第一次分流实验,定制含氟聚合物涂层 BMS [FP-only]与 BMS [n=8 个];第二次分流实验,FP-EES 与无涂层可生物降解聚合物西罗莫司洗脱支架 [BP-SES]与 BMS [n=8 个];第三次分流实验,FP-EES 与无聚合物涂层 Biolimus A9 支架 [PF-BCS]与 BMS [n=6 个])。循环 1 小时后,将支架切成两半,并用血小板鸡尾酒和炎症标志物对每一半进行双重免疫染色。通过共聚焦显微镜观察抗体染色。此外,还通过扫描电子显微镜评估支架。FP-only 支架的血小板黏附率明显低于 BMS(%荧光阳性面积:FP-only=1.8%,BMS=5.6%,p=0.047),而炎症细胞密度相似。FP-EES 与 BP-SES(p=0.056)、PF-BCS(p=0.013)和 BMS(p=0.003)相比,血小板黏附率最低,炎症细胞密度也最低,这表明氟聚合物涂层相对于 BMS 和无聚合物 DES 设计具有更强的抗血栓形成能力,这反映了一种称为氟钝化的独特现象,这是临床上观察到 FP-EES 低 ST 发生率的一种拟议机制。

相似文献

1
Acute thrombogenicity of fluoropolymer-coated versus biodegradable and polymer-free stents.氟聚合物涂层支架与生物可降解和无聚合物支架的急性血栓形成。
EuroIntervention. 2019 Mar 20;14(16):1685-1693. doi: 10.4244/EIJ-D-17-00728.
2
Acute Thrombogenicity of a Durable Polymer Everolimus-Eluting Stent Relative to Contemporary Drug-Eluting Stents With Biodegradable Polymer Coatings Assessed Ex Vivo in a Swine Shunt Model.在猪分流模型中体外评估耐久性聚合物依维莫司洗脱支架相对于具有生物可降解聚合物涂层的当代药物洗脱支架的急性血栓形成性。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2015 Aug 17;8(9):1248-1260. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2015.03.029.
3
Comparison of acute thrombogenicity and albumin adsorption in three different durable polymer coronary drug-eluting stents.三种不同耐用聚合物冠状动脉药物洗脱支架的急性血栓形成和白蛋白吸附比较。
EuroIntervention. 2021 Jun 25;17(3):248-256. doi: 10.4244/EIJ-D-19-00938.
4
Acute thrombogenicity of fluoropolymer coated stents versus competitive drug-eluting stents under single antiplatelet therapy.氟聚合物涂层支架与竞争药物洗脱支架在单一抗血小板治疗下的急性血栓形成。
Int J Cardiol. 2021 Sep 1;338:42-49. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2021.06.034. Epub 2021 Jun 23.
5
Comparative preclinical evaluation of a polymer-free sirolimus-eluting stent in porcine coronary arteries.无聚合物西罗莫司洗脱支架在猪冠状动脉中的临床前比较评估。
Ther Adv Cardiovasc Dis. 2019 Jan-Dec;13:1753944719826335. doi: 10.1177/1753944719826335.
6
Clinical outcomes with bioabsorbable polymer- versus durable polymer-based drug-eluting and bare-metal stents: evidence from a comprehensive network meta-analysis.生物可吸收聚合物与耐用聚合物载药及裸金属支架的临床疗效:来自综合网络荟萃分析的证据。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014 Feb 4;63(4):299-307. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2013.09.061. Epub 2013 Nov 6.
7
Comparable vascular response of a new generation sirolimus eluting stents when compared to fluoropolymer everolimus eluting stents in the porcine coronary restenosis model.在猪冠状动脉再狭窄模型中,新一代西罗莫司洗脱支架与氟聚合物依维莫司洗脱支架相比的类似血管反应。
Cardiol J. 2016;23(6):657-666. doi: 10.5603/CJ.2016.0108.
8
Endothelial Barrier Protein Expression in Biodegradable Polymer Sirolimus-Eluting Versus Durable Polymer Everolimus-Eluting Metallic Stents.可生物降解聚合物西罗莫司洗脱支架与持久性聚合物依维莫司洗脱金属支架的内皮屏障蛋白表达。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2017 Dec 11;10(23):2375-2387. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2017.06.059. Epub 2017 Nov 1.
9
Biodegradable-polymer drug-eluting stents vs. bare metal stents vs. durable-polymer drug-eluting stents: a systematic review and Bayesian approach network meta-analysis.可生物降解聚合物药物洗脱支架与裸金属支架与耐用聚合物药物洗脱支架的比较:系统评价和贝叶斯方法网络荟萃分析。
Eur Heart J. 2014 May;35(17):1147-58. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/eht570. Epub 2014 Jan 23.
10
Stent thrombosis with drug-eluting stents: is the paradigm shifting?药物洗脱支架血栓形成:范式是否正在转变?
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013 Nov 19;62(21):1915-1921. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2013.08.725. Epub 2013 Sep 11.

引用本文的文献

1
Challenges and advances in device-related thrombus in left atrial appendage occlusion.左心耳封堵术中与器械相关血栓形成的挑战与进展
Future Cardiol. 2024;20(7-8):343-358. doi: 10.1080/14796678.2024.2363063. Epub 2024 Jul 1.
2
A novel polymer-free everolimus-eluting stent with a nitrogen-doped titanium dioxide film inhibits restenosis and thrombosis in a swine coronary model.一种带有氮掺杂二氧化钛薄膜的新型无聚合物依维莫司洗脱支架可抑制猪冠状动脉模型中的再狭窄和血栓形成。
Cardiol J. 2023 Feb 15;30(6):881-91. doi: 10.5603/CJ.a2023.0006.
3
Durable polymer versus biodegradable polymer drug-eluting stents in patients with acute coronary syndrome undergoing complex percutaneous coronary intervention: a post hoc analysis of the HOST-REDUCE-POLYTECH-ACS trial.
急性冠状动脉综合征患者行复杂经皮冠状动脉介入治疗时使用的持久聚合物与可生物降解聚合物药物洗脱支架:HOST-REDUCE-POLYTECH-ACS 试验的事后分析。
EuroIntervention. 2022 Dec 2;18(11):e910-e919. doi: 10.4244/EIJ-D-22-00372.
4
Antiplatelet Effect of Single Antiplatelet Therapy With Prasugrel and Oral Anticoagulation After Stent Implantation in a Rabbit Arteriovenous Shunt Model.普拉格雷单药抗血小板治疗联合口服抗凝剂在兔动静脉分流模型中支架植入后的抗血小板作用
Circ Rep. 2021 Aug 7;3(9):504-510. doi: 10.1253/circrep.CR-21-0084. eCollection 2021 Sep 10.
5
STEMI outcomes in the era of COVID-19: reaffirmation of an unfortunate reality.COVID-19时代的ST段抬高型心肌梗死结局:对一个不幸现实的重申。
EuroIntervention. 2021 Apr 20;16(17):1379-1380. doi: 10.4244/EIJV16I17A250.
6
Five-Year Comparative Efficacy of Everolimus-Eluting vs. Resolute Zotarolimus-Eluting Stents in Patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.依维莫司洗脱支架与佐他莫司洗脱支架在接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的急性冠状动脉综合征患者中的五年疗效比较
J Clin Med. 2021 Mar 19;10(6):1278. doi: 10.3390/jcm10061278.
7
Vascular Wall Reactions to Coronary Stents-Clinical Implications for Stent Failure.血管壁对冠状动脉支架的反应——支架失败的临床意义
Life (Basel). 2021 Jan 17;11(1):63. doi: 10.3390/life11010063.
8
Clinical outcome of biodegradable polymer sirolimus-eluting stent and durable polymer everolimus-eluting stent in patients with diabetes.糖尿病患者应用可生物降解聚合物西罗莫司洗脱支架和持久性聚合物依维莫司洗脱支架的临床转归。
Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2020 Oct 1;19(1):162. doi: 10.1186/s12933-020-01145-x.
9
Early thrombogenicity of coronary stents: comparison of bioresorbable polymer sirolimus-eluting and bare metal stents in an aortic rat model.冠状动脉支架的早期血栓形成性:生物可吸收聚合物西罗莫司洗脱支架与裸金属支架在大鼠主动脉模型中的比较
Am J Cardiovasc Dis. 2020 Jun 15;10(2):72-83. eCollection 2020.
10
Comparison of acute thrombogenicity and albumin adsorption in three different durable polymer coronary drug-eluting stents.三种不同耐用聚合物冠状动脉药物洗脱支架的急性血栓形成和白蛋白吸附比较。
EuroIntervention. 2021 Jun 25;17(3):248-256. doi: 10.4244/EIJ-D-19-00938.