Bergstra Myrthe, DE Mulder Hannah N M, Coopmans Peter
UiL OTS, Utrecht University, the Netherlands.
LUCL, Leiden University, the Netherlands.
J Child Lang. 2018 Jul;45(4):900-916. doi: 10.1017/S030500091700054X. Epub 2018 Apr 6.
This study investigated how speaker certainty (a rational cue) and speaker benevolence (an emotional cue) influence children's willingness to learn words in a selective learning paradigm. In two experiments four- to six-year-olds learnt novel labels from two speakers and, after a week, their memory for these labels was reassessed. Results demonstrated that children retained the label-object pairings for at least a week. Furthermore, children preferred to learn from certain over uncertain speakers, but they had no significant preference for nice over nasty speakers. When the cues were combined, children followed certain speakers, even if they were nasty. However, children did prefer to learn from nice and certain speakers over nasty and certain speakers. These results suggest that rational cues regarding a speaker's linguistic competence trump emotional cues regarding a speaker's affective status in word learning. However, emotional cues were found to have a subtle influence on this process.
本研究调查了说话者的确定性(一种理性线索)和说话者的善意(一种情感线索)如何在选择性学习范式中影响儿童学习单词的意愿。在两项实验中,4至6岁的儿童从两位说话者那里学习新标签,一周后,重新评估他们对这些标签的记忆。结果表明,儿童至少能将标签与物体的配对记忆一周。此外,儿童更喜欢从确定的说话者而非不确定的说话者那里学习,但他们对友善的说话者和不友善的说话者没有明显偏好。当这两种线索结合时,儿童会听从确定的说话者,即使他们不友善。然而,儿童确实更喜欢从友善且确定的说话者那里学习,而不是不友善且确定的说话者。这些结果表明,在单词学习中,关于说话者语言能力的理性线索胜过关于说话者情感状态的情感线索。然而,发现情感线索对这一过程有微妙的影响。