Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Tokyo Institute of Technology, 2-12-1-M1-4 Ookayama, Tokyo 152-8552, Japan.
Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Tokyo Institute of Technology, 2-12-1-M1-4 Ookayama, Tokyo 152-8552, Japan; Department of Environmental Engineering and Earth Sciences, Clemson University, Anderson, SC 29625, USA.
Chemosphere. 2018 Jul;203:345-352. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2018.03.197. Epub 2018 Mar 30.
We have comprehensively compared the molecular sieving of natural organic matter (NOM) by adsorption on activated carbon (AC) and multi-walled carbon nanotubes (CNT) using different types of NOM. All water samples were characterized using UV-visible and fluorescence spectroscopies as well as high-performance size-exclusion chromatography (HPSEC) before and after adsorption. Adsorption isotherm results fitted well with Freundlich model (R = 0.95-0.99) and the model parameters indicated higher adsorption of NOM on CNT than AC. Fluorescence index (FI) and freshness index (BIX) showed preferential adsorption of microbial derived and fresh NOM on AC, whereas, terrestrial derived and decomposed NOM were preferentially adsorbed on CNT. Further, HPSEC revealed that AC adsorbed NOM fractions with small molecular weight (MW) (<0.4 kDa) faster than the fractions with higher MW. In contrast, CNT adsorbed NOM fractions characterized by high MW (>1 kDa) while the smallest fraction (<0.4 kDa) was not adsorbed, possibly due to its hydrophilic character. Our results also demonstrated a good correlation between FI and average MW of NOM (R > 0.93). These findings illustrate the influence of the adsorbent's type and characteristics (i.e., porosity and pore size distribution) on the preferential adsorption of different NOM fractions.
我们综合比较了通过活性炭 (AC) 和多壁碳纳米管 (CNT) 吸附对天然有机物 (NOM) 的分子筛作用,使用了不同类型的 NOM。所有水样均使用紫外可见分光光度法和荧光光谱法以及高效尺寸排阻色谱 (HPSEC) 进行了特征描述,在吸附前后进行了分析。吸附等温线结果很好地符合 Freundlich 模型 (R = 0.95-0.99),模型参数表明 NOM 在 CNT 上的吸附比在 AC 上更高。荧光指数 (FI) 和新鲜度指数 (BIX) 表明微生物衍生的和新鲜的 NOM 优先被 AC 吸附,而陆地衍生的和分解的 NOM 则优先被 CNT 吸附。此外,HPSEC 表明 AC 比 MW 较高的 NOM 更快地吸附 MW 较小的 NOM 分数(<0.4 kDa)。相比之下,CNT 吸附具有较高 MW (>1 kDa)的 NOM 分数,而最小的分数(<0.4 kDa)未被吸附,这可能是由于其亲水性。我们的结果还表明,FI 与 NOM 的平均 MW 之间存在良好的相关性 (R > 0.93)。这些发现说明了吸附剂类型和特性(即孔隙率和孔径分布)对不同 NOM 分数的优先吸附的影响。