• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

跨学科团队合作设计儿科肿瘤姑息治疗启动干预措施。

The codesign of an interdisciplinary team-based intervention regarding initiating palliative care in pediatric oncology.

机构信息

Roberts Center for Pediatric Research, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Room 11123, 3401 Civic Center Boulevard, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA.

Texas Children's Hospital, Houston, TX, USA.

出版信息

Support Care Cancer. 2018 Sep;26(9):3249-3256. doi: 10.1007/s00520-018-4190-5. Epub 2018 Apr 7.

DOI:10.1007/s00520-018-4190-5
PMID:29627863
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6379076/
Abstract

PURPOSE

Children with advanced cancer are often not referred to palliative or hospice care before they die or are only referred close to the child's death. The goals of the current project were to learn about pediatric oncology team members' perspectives on palliative care, to collaborate with team members to modify and tailor three separate interdisciplinary team-based interventions regarding initiating palliative care, and to assess the feasibility of this collaborative approach.

METHODS

We used a modified version of experience-based codesign (EBCD) involving members of the pediatric palliative care team and three interdisciplinary pediatric oncology teams (Bone Marrow Transplant, Neuro-Oncology, and Solid Tumor) to review and tailor materials for three team-based interventions. Eleven pediatric oncology team members participated in four codesign sessions to discuss their experiences with initiating palliative care and to review the proposed intervention including patient case studies, techniques for managing uncertainty and negative emotions, role ambiguity, system-level barriers, and team communication and collaboration.

RESULTS

The codesign process showed that the participants were strong supporters of palliative care, members of different teams had preferences for different materials that would be appropriate for their teams, and that while participants reported frustration with timing of palliative care, they had difficulty suggesting how to change current practices.

CONCLUSIONS

The current project demonstrated the feasibility of collaborating with pediatric oncology clinicians to develop interventions about introducing palliative care. The procedures and results of this project will be posted online so that other institutions can use them as a model for developing similar interventions appropriate for their needs.

摘要

目的

患有晚期癌症的儿童在去世前往往未被转介至姑息治疗或临终关怀机构,或仅在临近死亡时才被转介。本项目的目的是了解儿科肿瘤团队成员对姑息治疗的看法,与团队成员合作修改和定制三个关于启动姑息治疗的独立跨学科团队干预措施,并评估这种合作方法的可行性。

方法

我们使用了经验基础设计(EBCD)的改良版本,涉及儿科姑息治疗团队成员和三个跨学科儿科肿瘤团队(骨髓移植、神经肿瘤学和实体瘤),以审查和调整三个基于团队的干预措施的材料。11 名儿科肿瘤团队成员参加了四次设计会议,讨论他们在启动姑息治疗方面的经验,并审查拟议的干预措施,包括患者病例研究、处理不确定性和负面情绪的技巧、角色模糊、系统层面的障碍以及团队沟通和协作。

结果

设计过程表明,参与者强烈支持姑息治疗,不同团队的成员对适合他们团队的材料有偏好,尽管参与者报告对姑息治疗的时间安排感到沮丧,但他们难以提出如何改变当前做法。

结论

本项目证明了与儿科肿瘤临床医生合作制定姑息治疗介绍干预措施的可行性。该项目的程序和结果将在线发布,以便其他机构可以将其用作根据自身需求开发类似干预措施的模型。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5e7d/6379076/ac29c3eb46a4/nihms-1005360-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5e7d/6379076/ac29c3eb46a4/nihms-1005360-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5e7d/6379076/ac29c3eb46a4/nihms-1005360-f0001.jpg

相似文献

1
The codesign of an interdisciplinary team-based intervention regarding initiating palliative care in pediatric oncology.跨学科团队合作设计儿科肿瘤姑息治疗启动干预措施。
Support Care Cancer. 2018 Sep;26(9):3249-3256. doi: 10.1007/s00520-018-4190-5. Epub 2018 Apr 7.
2
An Interprofessional Team-Based Intervention to Address Barriers to Initiating Palliative Care in Pediatric Oncology: A Multiple-Method Evaluation of Feasibility, Acceptability, and Impact.跨专业团队式干预措施解决儿科肿瘤学中启动姑息治疗的障碍:对可行性、可接受性和影响的多方法评估。
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2021 Dec;62(6):1135-1144. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2021.06.008. Epub 2021 Jun 18.
3
The timing and circumstances of the implementation of pediatric palliative care in Hungarian pediatric oncology.匈牙利儿科肿瘤学中儿童姑息治疗的实施时间和情况。
Eur J Pediatr. 2018 Aug;177(8):1173-1179. doi: 10.1007/s00431-018-3170-6. Epub 2018 May 21.
4
Outcomes From a Patient-Centered, Interprofessional, Palliative Consult Team in Oncology.肿瘤学中以患者为中心的跨专业姑息治疗咨询团队的结果。
J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2018 Jun;16(6):719-726. doi: 10.6004/jnccn.2018.7014.
5
Pediatric palliative oncology: the state of the science and art of caring for children with cancer.儿科姑息肿瘤学:关爱癌症儿童的科学与艺术现状。
Curr Opin Pediatr. 2018 Feb;30(1):40-48. doi: 10.1097/MOP.0000000000000573.
6
Palliative care.姑息治疗。
J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2012 Oct 1;10(10):1284-309. doi: 10.6004/jnccn.2012.0132.
7
Improving the Quality of End-of-Life Care in Pediatric Oncology Patients Through the Early Implementation of Palliative Care.通过早期实施姑息治疗提高儿科肿瘤患者临终关怀质量。
J Pediatr Oncol Nurs. 2017 Nov/Dec;34(6):374-380. doi: 10.1177/1043454217713451. Epub 2017 Jun 10.
8
Barriers to Palliative Care in Pediatric Oncology in Switzerland: A Focus Group Study.瑞士儿童肿瘤姑息治疗的障碍:一项焦点小组研究
J Pediatr Oncol Nurs. 2020 Jan/Feb;37(1):35-45. doi: 10.1177/1043454219871082. Epub 2019 Sep 3.
9
Bridging the Cultural Divide Between Oncology and Palliative Care Subspecialties: Clinicians' Perceptions on Team Integration.弥合肿瘤学与姑息治疗亚专业之间的文化鸿沟:临床医生对团队整合的看法。
Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2018 Jul;35(7):978-984. doi: 10.1177/1049909117747288. Epub 2017 Dec 19.
10
Psychiatry and interdisciplinary pediatric palliative care: a scoping review.精神病学和跨学科儿科姑息治疗:范围综述。
Ann Palliat Med. 2024 Mar;13(2):415-427. doi: 10.21037/apm-23-501. Epub 2024 Mar 15.

引用本文的文献

1
Co-designed point-of-care ultrasound program development and implementation at a Veterans Affairs emergency department.在一家退伍军人事务部急诊科共同设计即时超声检查项目的开发与实施。
Intern Emerg Med. 2025 Apr 25. doi: 10.1007/s11739-025-03951-1.
2
Barriers and facilitators influencing referral and access to palliative care for children and young people with life-limiting and life-threatening conditions: a scoping review of the evidence.影响有限生命和危及生命状况的儿童和青少年获得姑息治疗转诊和机会的障碍和促进因素:证据范围综述。
Palliat Med. 2024 Oct;38(9):981-999. doi: 10.1177/02692163241271010. Epub 2024 Sep 9.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Self-Assessment Scores Improve After Simulation-Based Palliative Care Communication Skill Workshops.基于模拟的姑息治疗沟通技能研讨班后自我评估分数提高。
Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2018 Jan;35(1):45-51. doi: 10.1177/1049909116681972. Epub 2016 Dec 14.
2
Using Experience-based Co-design with older patients, their families and staff to improve palliative care experiences in the Emergency Department: A reflective critique on the process and outcomes.与老年患者、其家属及工作人员采用基于经验的协同设计来改善急诊科的姑息治疗体验:对过程与结果的反思性批判
Int J Nurs Stud. 2017 Mar;68:83-94. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2017.01.002. Epub 2017 Jan 11.
3
Experiences with a national team-based learning program for advance care planning in pediatric palliative care.
国家团队为儿科临终关怀的预先医疗指示计划所进行的学习经验。
BMC Palliat Care. 2024 Aug 3;23(1):196. doi: 10.1186/s12904-024-01515-2.
4
Palliative Care in Pediatric Oncology and Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation.儿科肿瘤学与造血干细胞移植中的姑息治疗
Curr Oncol Rep. 2022 Feb;24(2):161-174. doi: 10.1007/s11912-021-01174-z. Epub 2022 Jan 21.
5
An Interprofessional Team-Based Intervention to Address Barriers to Initiating Palliative Care in Pediatric Oncology: A Multiple-Method Evaluation of Feasibility, Acceptability, and Impact.跨专业团队式干预措施解决儿科肿瘤学中启动姑息治疗的障碍:对可行性、可接受性和影响的多方法评估。
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2021 Dec;62(6):1135-1144. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2021.06.008. Epub 2021 Jun 18.
6
Specialist paediatric palliative care for children and young people with cancer: A mixed-methods systematic review.儿童癌症患者的专科儿童姑息治疗:一项混合方法系统评价。
Palliat Med. 2020 Jun;34(6):731-775. doi: 10.1177/0269216320908490. Epub 2020 May 2.
7
Psychosocial care for children receiving chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy.儿童嵌合抗原受体 (CAR) T 细胞治疗的心理社会关怀。
Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2020 May;67(5):e28249. doi: 10.1002/pbc.28249. Epub 2020 Mar 11.
8
A conceptual model of barriers and facilitators to primary clinical teams requesting pediatric palliative care consultation based upon a narrative review.基于叙述性回顾的主要临床团队请求儿科姑息治疗咨询的障碍和促进因素的概念模型。
BMC Palliat Care. 2019 Dec 21;18(1):116. doi: 10.1186/s12904-019-0504-8.
9
Seven Types of Uncertainty When Clinicians Care for Pediatric Patients With Advanced Cancer.临床医生为晚期癌症儿科患者提供治疗时面临的七种不确定性。
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2020 Jan;59(1):86-94. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2019.08.010. Epub 2019 Aug 16.
Evaluation of an Organisational Intervention to Promote Integrated Working between Health Services and Care Homes in the Delivery of End-of-Life Care for People with Dementia: Understanding the Change Process Using a Social Identity Approach.
评估一项组织干预措施,以促进卫生服务机构与养老院在为痴呆症患者提供临终关怀方面的整合协作:运用社会认同方法理解变革过程。
Int J Integr Care. 2016 Jun 3;16(2):14. doi: 10.5334/ijic.2426.
4
The Effects of a Brief Acceptance-Based Behavioral Treatment Versus Traditional Cognitive-Behavioral Treatment for Public Speaking Anxiety: An Exploratory Trial Examining Differential Effects on Performance and Neurophysiology.基于接纳的简短行为疗法与传统认知行为疗法对演讲焦虑的影响:一项探究对表现和神经生理学不同影响的试验
Behav Modif. 2016 Sep;40(5):748-76. doi: 10.1177/0145445516629939. Epub 2016 Feb 11.
5
Using Brief Cognitive Restructuring and Cognitive Defusion Techniques to Cope With Negative Thoughts.运用简短认知重构和认知解离技巧应对消极思维。
Behav Modif. 2016 May;40(3):452-82. doi: 10.1177/0145445515621488. Epub 2015 Dec 18.
6
Designing quality of care--contributions from parents: Parents' experiences of care processes in paediatric care and their contribution to improvements of the care process in collaboration with healthcare professionals.设计护理质量——来自家长的贡献:家长在儿科护理中对护理过程的体验以及他们与医护人员合作对改善护理过程的贡献。
J Clin Nurs. 2016 Mar;25(5-6):742-51. doi: 10.1111/jocn.13050. Epub 2015 Oct 29.
7
End-of-Life Care Intensity Among Adolescent and Young Adult Patients With Cancer in Kaiser Permanente Southern California.加利福尼亚州凯撒永久医疗集团的青少年和年轻成年癌症患者的临终关怀强度。
JAMA Oncol. 2015 Aug;1(5):592-600. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2015.1953.
8
The CORE study protocol: a stepped wedge cluster randomised controlled trial to test a co-design technique to optimise psychosocial recovery outcomes for people affected by mental illness in the community mental health setting.CORE研究方案:一项阶梯楔形整群随机对照试验,旨在测试一种协同设计技术,以优化社区心理健康环境中受精神疾病影响者的心理社会康复结果。
BMJ Open. 2015 Mar 24;5(3):e006688. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-006688.
9
Enhancing the experience of carers in the chemotherapy outpatient setting: an exploratory randomised controlled trial to test impact, acceptability and feasibility of a complex intervention co-designed by carers and staff.改善化疗门诊环境中护理人员的体验:一项探索性随机对照试验,以测试由护理人员和工作人员共同设计的复杂干预措施的效果、可接受性和可行性。
Support Care Cancer. 2015 Oct;23(10):3069-80. doi: 10.1007/s00520-015-2677-x. Epub 2015 Mar 6.
10
Patients and staff as codesigners of healthcare services.患者和工作人员作为医疗服务的共同设计者。
BMJ. 2015 Feb 10;350:g7714. doi: 10.1136/bmj.g7714.