Community Services, Western Health.
Department of Medicine, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Int J Evid Based Healthc. 2018 Sep;16(3):174-181. doi: 10.1097/XEB.0000000000000142.
Reducing potentially avoidable hospital readmissions has been the target of several healthcare initiatives, including the readmission prevention team (RAPT) at Western Health, Melbourne. Study aims were to evaluate if the revised LACE (length of stay, acuity of admission, Charlson Comorbidity Index, emergency department visits in the past 6 months) index would identify high risk of early readmission (≤30 days postdischarge), and if postdischarge clinic and community services follow-up would reduce readmission rate.
A prospective study was conducted among all general medicine inpatients within a tertiary hospital in Melbourne, Australia between February to April 2016, with risk screening using the revised LACE index, alongside abbreviated mental test and clinical frailty scale testing, with high-risk patients (revised LACE ≥ 8) offered specialist clinic appointment and/or referral to community services.
Among 781 patients (873 admission episodes), 358 (41.0%) admission episodes were classified as high risk of early readmission. Revised LACE index scores were equivalent for readmission vs. non-readmission episodes, {median 7 [interquartile range (IQR) 5, 8] vs. 7 [IQR 4, 8])}, as were median abbreviated mental test (8 [IQR 6, 9] vs. 8 [IQR 6, 9]) and clinical frailty scale scores (5 [IQR 3, 6] vs. 5 [IQR 3, 6]). Early readmission rates were equivalent for those who received compared with did not receive RAPT intervention (14.3 vs. 14.7%), albeit confounded by lack of identification of readmission risk using the revised LACE index. A total of 53 (14.8%) of the 358 high-risk admission episodes formally declined RAPT follow-up.
This study highlighted the complexities of addressing hospital readmissions, with challenges in identifying those at risk, and low uptake and impact of current intervention strategies. Future research directions may evaluate other contributors to readmission risk, and the development of acceptable postdischarge interventions to effectively address risk.
降低潜在可避免的住院再入院率一直是多项医疗保健计划的目标,包括墨尔本西部健康的再入院预防团队(RAPT)。本研究旨在评估修订后的 LACE(住院时间、入院时的严重程度、Charlson 合并症指数、过去 6 个月内急诊就诊次数)指数是否能识别出早期再入院(出院后≤30 天)的高风险,并评估出院后门诊和社区服务的随访是否能降低再入院率。
本前瞻性研究于 2016 年 2 月至 4 月在澳大利亚墨尔本的一家三级医院的所有综合内科住院患者中进行,采用修订后的 LACE 指数进行风险筛查,同时进行简易精神状态检查和临床虚弱量表检查,对高危患者(修订后的 LACE≥8)提供专科门诊预约和/或转介至社区服务。
在 781 名患者(873 个入院事件)中,358 个(41.0%)入院事件被归类为早期再入院的高风险。再入院与非再入院事件的修订后的 LACE 指数评分相当,{中位数 7 [四分位距(IQR)5,8] vs. 7 [IQR 4,8]},简易精神状态检查和临床虚弱量表的评分也相当,中位数分别为 8 [IQR 6,9] 和 5 [IQR 3,6]。接受和未接受 RAPT 干预的患者的早期再入院率相当(14.3%vs.14.7%),但由于缺乏使用修订后的 LACE 指数识别再入院风险,因此受到混杂因素影响。358 个高危入院事件中,共有 53 例(14.8%)正式拒绝 RAPT 随访。
本研究强调了处理医院再入院问题的复杂性,包括识别高危人群的挑战,以及当前干预策略的低利用率和影响。未来的研究方向可能评估再入院风险的其他因素,以及制定可接受的出院后干预措施,以有效应对风险。