Suppr超能文献

教住院医师如何谈论死亡与濒死:对障碍因素及随机教育干预的混合方法分析

Teaching Residents How to Talk About Death and Dying: A Mixed-Methods Analysis of Barriers and Randomized Educational Intervention.

作者信息

Miller David C, Sullivan Amy M, Soffler Morgan, Armstrong Brett, Anandaiah Asha, Rock Laura, McSparron Jakob I, Schwartzstein Richard M, Hayes Margaret M

机构信息

1 Division of Pulmonary, Allergy, Critical Care and Sleep Medicine, University of Arizona College of Medicine, Tucson, AZ, USA.

2 Division of Pulmonary, Critical Care and Sleep Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.

出版信息

Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2018 Sep;35(9):1221-1226. doi: 10.1177/1049909118769674. Epub 2018 Apr 11.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

We present a pilot study exploring the effects of a brief, 30-minute educational intervention targeting resident communication surrounding dying in the intensive care unit (ICU). We sought to determine whether simulation or didactic educational interventions improved resident-reported comfort, preparation, and skill acquisition. We also sought to identify resident barriers to using the word "dying."

METHODS

In this mixed-methods prospective study, second- and third-year medical residents were randomized to participate in a simulation-based communication training or a didactic session. Residents completed a pre-post survey after the sessions evaluating the sessions and reflecting on their use of the word "dying" in family meetings.

RESULTS

Forty-five residents participated in the study. Residents reported increases in comfort (Mean [M]-pre = 3.3 [standard deviation: 0.6], M-post = 3.7 [0.7]; P < .01, Cohen d = 0.75) and preparation (M-pre = 3.4 [0.7], M-post = 3.9 [0.6]; P < .01, d = 1.07) using the word "dying" after both the simulation and didactic versions. Residents randomized to the simulation reported they were more likely to have learned new skills as compared to residents in the didactic (M-simulation = 2.2 [0.4], M-didactic = 1.9 [0.3]; P = .015, d = 0.80). They estimated that they used the word "dying" in 50% of their end-of-life (EOL) conversations and identified uncertain prognosis as the main barrier to explicitly stating the word "dying."

CONCLUSION

A 30-minute educational intervention improves internal medicine residents' self-reported comfort and preparation in talking about death and dying in the ICU. Residents in simulation-based training were more likely to report they learned new skills as compared to the didactic session. Residents report multiple barriers to using the word "dying" EOL conversations.

摘要

目的

我们开展了一项初步研究,探讨针对重症监护病房(ICU)住院医师围绕临终沟通进行的为期30分钟简短教育干预的效果。我们试图确定模拟教育干预或理论讲授式教育干预是否能提高住院医师报告的舒适度、准备情况和技能掌握程度。我们还试图找出住院医师在使用“死亡”一词时面临的障碍。

方法

在这项混合方法的前瞻性研究中,将二年级和三年级医学住院医师随机分为两组,分别参与基于模拟的沟通培训或理论讲授课程。住院医师在课程结束后完成一份前后测调查问卷,评估课程并反思他们在家庭会议中使用“死亡”一词的情况。

结果

45名住院医师参与了该研究。住院医师报告称,在模拟和理论讲授两种形式的课程之后,使用“死亡”一词时的舒适度(均值[M]-前测 = 3.3[标准差:0.6],M-后测 = 3.7[0.7];P <.01,科恩d值 = 0.75)和准备情况(M-前测 = 3.4[0.7],M-后测 = 3.9[0.6];P <.01,d值 = 1.07)均有所提高。与参加理论讲授课程的住院医师相比,随机分配到模拟培训的住院医师报告称他们更有可能学到了新技能(M-模拟 = 2.2[0.4],M-理论讲授 = 1.9[0.3];P =.015,d值 = 0.80)。他们估计在50%的临终(EOL)谈话中使用了“死亡”一词,并将预后不确定视为明确说出“死亡”一词的主要障碍。

结论

一项30分钟的教育干预提高了内科住院医师在ICU中谈论死亡和临终时自我报告的舒适度和准备情况。与理论讲授课程相比,基于模拟培训的住院医师更有可能报告他们学到了新技能。住院医师报告了在临终谈话中使用“死亡”一词时存在多种障碍。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验