• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

线索提示任务切换中跨通道注意准备与通道兼容性的相互作用。

The interplay of crossmodal attentional preparation and modality compatibility in cued task switching.

作者信息

Fintor Edina, Stephan Denise N, Koch Iring

机构信息

Institute of Psychology, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany.

出版信息

Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2019 Apr;72(4):955-965. doi: 10.1177/1747021818771836. Epub 2018 May 7.

DOI:10.1177/1747021818771836
PMID:29642783
Abstract

Two experiments examined the influence of preparation on modality compatibility effects in task switching. The term modality compatibility refers to the similarity between the stimulus modality and the modality of response-related sensory consequences. Previous research showed evidence for modality compatibility benefits in task switching when participants switched either between two modality compatible tasks (auditory-vocal and visual-manual) or between two modality incompatible tasks (auditory-manual and visual-vocal). In this study, we investigated the influence of active preparation on modality compatibility effects in task switching. To this end, in Experiment 1, we introduced unimodal modality cues, whereas in Experiment 2, bimodal abstract cues were used. In both experiments, the cue-stimulus interval (CSI) was manipulated while holding the response-stimulus interval (RSI) constant. In both experiments, we found not only decreased switch costs with long CSI but also the elimination of the residual switch costs. More importantly, this preparation effect did not modulate the modality compatibility effect in task switching. To account for this data pattern, we assume that cue-based preparation of switches by modality mappings was highly effective and produced no residual reaction time (RT) costs with long CSI.

摘要

两项实验考察了准备状态对任务转换中模态兼容性效应的影响。术语“模态兼容性”指的是刺激模态与反应相关感觉结果的模态之间的相似性。先前的研究表明,当参与者在两个模态兼容的任务(听觉-发声和视觉-手动)之间或两个模态不兼容的任务(听觉-手动和视觉-发声)之间进行转换时,任务转换中存在模态兼容性优势。在本研究中,我们考察了主动准备状态对任务转换中模态兼容性效应的影响。为此,在实验1中,我们引入了单模态模态线索,而在实验2中,使用了双模态抽象线索。在两个实验中,在保持反应-刺激间隔(RSI)恒定的同时,对线索-刺激间隔(CSI)进行了操纵。在两个实验中,我们不仅发现长CSI时转换成本降低,而且消除了残余转换成本。更重要的是,这种准备效应并未调节任务转换中的模态兼容性效应。为了解释这种数据模式,我们假设基于线索的通过模态映射进行的转换准备非常有效,并且长CSI时不会产生残余反应时(RT)成本。

相似文献

1
The interplay of crossmodal attentional preparation and modality compatibility in cued task switching.线索提示任务切换中跨通道注意准备与通道兼容性的相互作用。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2019 Apr;72(4):955-965. doi: 10.1177/1747021818771836. Epub 2018 May 7.
2
Central cross-talk in task switching: Evidence from manipulating input-output modality compatibility.任务转换中的中央交叉对话:来自输入-输出模态兼容性操纵的证据。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2010 Jul;36(4):1075-81. doi: 10.1037/a0019695.
3
The role of preparation and cue-modality in crossmodal task switching.准备工作和线索模态在跨通道任务切换中的作用。
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2010 Jul;134(3):318-22. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2010.03.004.
4
Emerging features of modality mappings in task switching: modality compatibility requires variability at the level of both stimulus and response modality.任务切换中模态映射的新特征:模态兼容性要求刺激模态和反应模态层面都具有变异性。
Psychol Res. 2018 Jan;82(1):121-133. doi: 10.1007/s00426-017-0875-5. Epub 2017 Jun 3.
5
Sensory-motor modality compatibility in multitasking: The influence of processing codes.多任务处理中的感觉运动模态兼容性:处理代码的影响。
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2018 Nov;191:210-218. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2018.09.012. Epub 2018 Oct 9.
6
Modality-specific effects on crosstalk in task switching: evidence from modality compatibility using bimodal stimulation.任务切换中模态特异性对串扰的影响:来自使用双峰刺激的模态兼容性的证据。
Psychol Res. 2016 Nov;80(6):935-943. doi: 10.1007/s00426-015-0700-y. Epub 2015 Sep 16.
7
Voluntary task switching is affected by modality compatibility and preparation.自愿任务转换受模态兼容性和准备的影响。
Mem Cognit. 2024 Jul;52(5):1195-1209. doi: 10.3758/s13421-024-01536-5. Epub 2024 Feb 22.
8
The role of crossmodal competition and dimensional overlap in crossmodal attention switching.跨通道竞争和维度重叠在跨通道注意转换中的作用。
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2015 Feb;155:67-76. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2014.12.006. Epub 2015 Jan 8.
9
Tactile Stimuli Increase Effects of Modality Compatibility in Task Switching.触觉刺激增强任务切换中模态兼容性的效应。
Exp Psychol. 2015;62(4):276-84. doi: 10.1027/1618-3169/a000291. Epub 2015 Jan 1.
10
The role of sensory-motor modality compatibility in language processing.感觉运动模态兼容性在语言处理中的作用。
Psychol Res. 2016 Mar;80(2):212-23. doi: 10.1007/s00426-015-0661-1. Epub 2015 Mar 27.

引用本文的文献

1
Impact of Poor Sleep Quality on Task Switching and Reconfiguration Process Among University Students.睡眠质量差对大学生任务转换及重新配置过程的影响
Behav Sci (Basel). 2025 Aug 4;15(8):1054. doi: 10.3390/bs15081054.
2
Limitation of switching sensory information flow in flexible perceptual decision making.灵活感知决策中切换感官信息流的局限性。
Nat Commun. 2025 Jan 2;16(1):172. doi: 10.1038/s41467-024-55686-w.
3
Are some effector systems harder to switch to? In search of cost asymmetries when switching between manual, vocal, and oculomotor tasks.
是否有些效应器系统更难切换?在手动、语音和眼动任务之间切换时寻找成本不对称性。
Mem Cognit. 2022 Oct;50(7):1563-1577. doi: 10.3758/s13421-022-01287-1. Epub 2022 Feb 23.
4
Dissociating stimulus-response compatibility and modality compatibility in task switching.在任务切换中区分刺激-反应兼容性和模态兼容性
Mem Cognit. 2022 Oct;50(7):1546-1562. doi: 10.3758/s13421-022-01276-4. Epub 2022 Feb 1.
5
How Task Set and Task Switching Modulate Perceptual Processes: Is Recognition of Facial Emotion an Exception?任务集和任务切换如何调节感知过程:对面部表情的识别是个例外吗?
J Cogn. 2021 Aug 5;4(1):36. doi: 10.5334/joc.179. eCollection 2021.
6
Modality compatibility in task switching depends on processing codes and task demands.任务转换中的模态兼容性取决于加工码和任务需求。
Psychol Res. 2021 Sep;85(6):2346-2363. doi: 10.1007/s00426-020-01412-2. Epub 2020 Sep 7.
7
Modality compatibility biases voluntary choice of response modality in task switching.模态兼容性偏倚任务转换中对反应模态的自愿选择。
Psychol Res. 2020 Mar;84(2):380-388. doi: 10.1007/s00426-018-1040-5. Epub 2018 Jun 20.