• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

从动态场景中学习物理参数。

Learning physical parameters from dynamic scenes.

作者信息

Ullman Tomer D, Stuhlmüller Andreas, Goodman Noah D, Tenenbaum Joshua B

机构信息

Department of Brain and Cognitive Sciences, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, USA.

Department of Brain and Cognitive Sciences, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, USA.

出版信息

Cogn Psychol. 2018 Aug;104:57-82. doi: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2017.05.006. Epub 2018 Apr 11.

DOI:10.1016/j.cogpsych.2017.05.006
PMID:29653395
Abstract

Humans acquire their most basic physical concepts early in development, and continue to enrich and expand their intuitive physics throughout life as they are exposed to more and varied dynamical environments. We introduce a hierarchical Bayesian framework to explain how people can learn physical parameters at multiple levels. In contrast to previous Bayesian models of theory acquisition (Tenenbaum, Kemp, Griffiths, & Goodman, 2011), we work with more expressive probabilistic program representations suitable for learning the forces and properties that govern how objects interact in dynamic scenes unfolding over time. We compare our model to human learners on a challenging task of estimating multiple physical parameters in novel microworlds given short movies. This task requires people to reason simultaneously about multiple interacting physical laws and properties. People are generally able to learn in this setting and are consistent in their judgments. Yet they also make systematic errors indicative of the approximations people might make in solving this computationally demanding problem with limited computational resources. We propose two approximations that complement the top-down Bayesian approach. One approximation model relies on a more bottom-up feature-based inference scheme. The second approximation combines the strengths of the bottom-up and top-down approaches, by taking the feature-based inference as its point of departure for a search in physical-parameter space.

摘要

人类在发育早期就获得了最基本的物理概念,并在一生中不断丰富和扩展他们的直观物理学知识,因为他们接触到更多样化的动态环境。我们引入了一个分层贝叶斯框架来解释人们如何在多个层面学习物理参数。与之前的理论习得贝叶斯模型(Tenenbaum、Kemp、Griffiths和Goodman,2011)不同,我们使用更具表现力的概率程序表示法,适合于学习在随时间展开的动态场景中物体如何相互作用的力和属性。我们在一项具有挑战性的任务中将我们的模型与人类学习者进行比较,该任务是根据短视频估计新颖微观世界中的多个物理参数。这项任务要求人们同时对多个相互作用的物理定律和属性进行推理。人们通常能够在这种情况下学习,并且判断一致。然而,他们也会犯系统性错误,这表明人们在使用有限的计算资源解决这个计算要求高的问题时可能会做出的近似处理。我们提出了两种近似方法来补充自上而下的贝叶斯方法。一种近似模型依赖于一种更自下而上的基于特征的推理方案。第二种近似方法结合了自下而上和自上而下方法的优点,以基于特征的推理为出发点,在物理参数空间中进行搜索。

相似文献

1
Learning physical parameters from dynamic scenes.从动态场景中学习物理参数。
Cogn Psychol. 2018 Aug;104:57-82. doi: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2017.05.006. Epub 2018 Apr 11.
2
Inferring mass in complex scenes by mental simulation.通过心理模拟推断复杂场景中的质量。
Cognition. 2016 Dec;157:61-76. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2016.08.012. Epub 2016 Sep 2.
3
Reconciling intuitive physics and Newtonian mechanics for colliding objects.协调碰撞物体的直觉物理和牛顿力学。
Psychol Rev. 2013 Apr;120(2):411-37. doi: 10.1037/a0031912. Epub 2013 Mar 4.
4
Intuitive physical reasoning about objects' masses transfers to a visuomotor decision task consistent with Newtonian physics.关于物体质量的直观物理推理会转移到符合牛顿物理学的视动决策任务中。
PLoS Comput Biol. 2020 Oct 19;16(10):e1007730. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1007730. eCollection 2020 Oct.
5
Learning a commonsense moral theory.学习一种常识性道德理论。
Cognition. 2017 Oct;167:107-123. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2017.03.005. Epub 2017 Mar 27.
6
Bayesian analogy with relational transformations.贝叶斯类比与关系变换。
Psychol Rev. 2012 Jul;119(3):617-48. doi: 10.1037/a0028719.
7
Theory-based Bayesian models of inductive learning and reasoning.基于理论的归纳学习与推理贝叶斯模型。
Trends Cogn Sci. 2006 Jul;10(7):309-18. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2006.05.009. Epub 2006 Jun 22.
8
The logical primitives of thought: Empirical foundations for compositional cognitive models.思维的逻辑原语:组合认知模型的经验基础。
Psychol Rev. 2016 Jul;123(4):392-424. doi: 10.1037/a0039980. Epub 2016 Apr 14.
9
Causal learning and inference as a rational process: the new synthesis.因果学习与推理作为一种理性过程:新综合。
Annu Rev Psychol. 2011;62:135-63. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.121208.131634.
10
Win-Stay, Lose-Sample: a simple sequential algorithm for approximating Bayesian inference.赢则保留,输则抽样:一种用于近似贝叶斯推断的简单序贯算法。
Cogn Psychol. 2014 Nov;74:35-65. doi: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2014.06.003. Epub 2014 Aug 1.

引用本文的文献

1
Symbolic metaprogram search improves learning efficiency and explains rule learning in humans.符号元编程搜索提高了学习效率,并解释了人类的规则学习。
Nat Commun. 2024 Aug 10;15(1):6847. doi: 10.1038/s41467-024-50966-x.
2
Incorporating simulated spatial context information improves the effectiveness of contrastive learning models.纳入模拟空间上下文信息可提高对比学习模型的有效性。
Patterns (N Y). 2024 Mar 26;5(5):100964. doi: 10.1016/j.patter.2024.100964. eCollection 2024 May 10.
3
Designing optimal behavioral experiments using machine learning.
使用机器学习设计最优行为实验。
Elife. 2024 Jan 23;13:e86224. doi: 10.7554/eLife.86224.
4
Adaptive search space pruning in complex strategic problems.复杂战略问题中的自适应搜索空间剪枝。
PLoS Comput Biol. 2022 Aug 10;18(8):e1010358. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1010358. eCollection 2022 Aug.
5
Intuitive physical reasoning about objects' masses transfers to a visuomotor decision task consistent with Newtonian physics.关于物体质量的直观物理推理会转移到符合牛顿物理学的视动决策任务中。
PLoS Comput Biol. 2020 Oct 19;16(10):e1007730. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1007730. eCollection 2020 Oct.
6
Invariant representations of mass in the human brain.人类大脑中质量的不变表示。
Elife. 2019 Dec 17;8:e46619. doi: 10.7554/eLife.46619.
7
An integrative computational architecture for object-driven cortex.面向对象驱动皮层的综合计算架构。
Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2019 Apr;55:73-81. doi: 10.1016/j.conb.2019.01.010. Epub 2019 Feb 28.