Zhang Bo, Zhai Yanhua, Gu Zemao, Liu Yang
Department of Aquatic Animal Medicine, College of Fisheries, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, 430070, People's Republic of China.
Hubei Engineering Research Center for Aquatic Animal Diseases Control and Prevention, Wuhan, 430070, People's Republic of China.
Acta Parasitol. 2018 Jun 26;63(2):221-231. doi: 10.1515/ap-2018-0026.
A Myxobolus species and a Thelohanellus species infecting Carassius auratus gibelio (Bloch, 1782) were redescribed by their morphological, histological and molecular characterization. In the present study, the Myxobolus species infecting the muscle was identified as Myxobolus kingchowensis Chen et Ma, 1998 by the morphological and molecular data. Histologically, mature spores of M. kingchowensis were observed in the intercellular and connective tissue of muscle, though the plasmodia were not found. In addition, scattered spores also occurred in the intercellular of haematopoietic cells, intraepithelial of the renal tubules and interior of the melano-macrophage centres. Phylogenetic analysis showed that M. kingchowensis clustered in the clade of muscle-infecting Myxobolus species, further supporting muscle as the infection site of M. kingchowensis. The present Thelohanellus species infecting the gills was identified conspecific as Thelohanellus sinensis reported in Sun (2006) (mark it as T. sinensis-Sun)based on spore morphology, biological traits (host specificity and organ specificity), and molecular data. However, compared with the original description of T. sinensis Chen et Hsieh, 1960, the present Thelohanellus species and T. sinensis-Sun both infecting the gills of gibel carp are distinguishable from the original description in the host and infection site, which made the validity of T. sinensis-Sun dubious. Due to the absence of molecular data in the original description of T. sinensis, we suggest marking the present species and T. sinensis-Sun as T. cf. sinensis to avoid the confusion until T. sinensis is obtained from the type host and type infection site.
通过形态学、组织学和分子特征对感染银鲫(Carassius auratus gibelio,Bloch,1782)的一种粘体虫属(Myxobolus)物种和一种碘泡虫属(Thelohanellus)物种进行了重新描述。在本研究中,通过形态学和分子数据将感染肌肉的粘体虫属物种鉴定为1998年陈和马描述的鲩粘体虫(Myxobolus kingchowensis)。组织学上,在肌肉的细胞间和结缔组织中观察到了鲩粘体虫的成熟孢子,尽管未发现原质团。此外,造血细胞的细胞间、肾小管的上皮内以及黑色素巨噬细胞中心内部也散在出现孢子。系统发育分析表明,鲩粘体虫聚集在感染肌肉的粘体虫属物种分支中,进一步支持肌肉是鲩粘体虫的感染部位。基于孢子形态、生物学特性(宿主特异性和器官特异性)以及分子数据,将本研究中感染鳃的碘泡虫属物种鉴定为与孙(2006年)报道的中华碘泡虫(Thelohanellus sinensis)同种(标记为T. sinensis-Sun)。然而,与1960年陈和谢对中华碘泡虫的原始描述相比,本研究中均感染银鲫鳃的碘泡虫属物种和T. sinensis-Sun在宿主和感染部位方面与原始描述存在差异,这使得T. sinensis-Sun的有效性存疑。由于中华碘泡虫的原始描述中缺乏分子数据,我们建议将本物种和T. sinensis-Sun标记为T. cf. sinensis,以避免混淆,直到从模式宿主和模式感染部位获得中华碘泡虫。