Department of Neurology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, USA.
Department of Anesthesiology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, USA.
Neurocrit Care. 2018 Aug;29(1):110-112. doi: 10.1007/s12028-018-0533-9.
A challenge in ICU EEG interpretation is identifying subclinical status epilepticus versus patterns on the ictal-interictal continuum versus other repetitive patterns. In the electrically noisy intensive care unit, identifying and eliminating interference and artifact allow accurate diagnoses from the EEG, avoiding unnecessary treatment or sedation.
We present a case during Impella (Abiomed Inc, Danvers, MA) continuous flow left ventricular assist device use where the EEG artifact was initially misinterpreted as seizure by the resident and treated as status epilepticus because of the "focal" sharply contoured repetitive pattern. During percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), an 88-year-old developed ventricular tachycardia followed by ventricular fibrillation requiring chest compressions for 10 min, multiple defibrillations, and treatment with epinephrine, amiodarone, calcium, bicarbonate, and magnesium. The patient had an Impella placed during PCI with therapeutic hypothermia initiated after the cardiopulmonary arrest. His neurological exam demonstrated preserved pupillary, corneal, gag and cough reflexes and spontaneous respirations.
Long-term video EEG monitoring is included in our institution's hypothermia protocol. Initial baseline EEG performed 2 h after PCI showed a persistent rhythmic sharp discharge from the left central temporal region resembling left hemisphere status epilepticus. The sharp waves have an alternating repeating 2:1 relationship with the EKG rhythm strip. This is best seen in the left hemisphere, which we posit is related to the Impella's positioning across the aortic valve pointing toward the patient's left side. A chest x-ray confirmed the device's position immediately before EEG monitoring. Arterial pressure tracings were not available in the chart.
There is a low-amplitude spiky artifact; however, there was no pacing at that time. It is possible that synergistic flow with systole/diastole reinforced the pulsatility with movement of the Impella, resulting in the alternating pattern. The patient's hemodynamic instability precluded extensive troubleshooting with the Impella device, but after EEG repositioning, the artifact was eliminated.
在 ICU 脑电图(EEG)解读中,一项挑战是识别亚临床癫痫发作与发作-发作间连续体模式或其他重复模式。在电噪声环境下的重症监护病房中,识别和消除干扰和伪影可使 EEG 做出准确诊断,避免不必要的治疗或镇静。
我们介绍了一个在使用 Impella(Abiomed Inc,Danvers,MA)连续血流左心室辅助装置时发生的病例,驻院医生最初将 EEG 伪影误诊为癫痫发作,并将其视为癫痫持续状态,因为其具有“局灶性”急剧轮廓重复模式。在经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)期间,一位 88 岁患者发生室性心动过速,随后发生心室颤动,需进行 10 分钟的胸外按压、多次除颤,并接受肾上腺素、胺碘酮、钙、碳酸氢盐和镁治疗。该患者在 PCI 期间放置了 Impella,心肺骤停后开始进行亚低温治疗。他的神经检查显示瞳孔、角膜、咽反射和咳嗽反射正常,且有自主呼吸。
我们机构的低温治疗方案中包括长期视频脑电图监测。PCI 后 2 小时进行的初始基线 EEG 显示,来自左侧中央颞区的持续性节律性锐波放电类似于左半球癫痫持续状态。这些锐波与心电图节律带呈 2:1 交替重复关系。在左侧半球最为明显,我们认为这与 Impella 横跨主动脉瓣指向患者左侧的位置有关。在进行 EEG 监测之前,胸部 X 光片确认了设备的位置。图表中没有动脉血压轨迹。
存在低幅度尖峰伪影,但当时没有起搏。Impella 与心脏收缩/舒张同步产生的协同血流可能会增强搏动,从而导致交替模式。患者的血流动力学不稳定,无法对 Impella 设备进行广泛的故障排除,但在重新定位 EEG 后,伪影消除。