Prieto Carlos, Nuñez Rayner, Hausmann Axel
a Departamento de Biología , Universidad del Atlántico , Barranquilla , Colombia.
b SNSB-Bavarian State Collection of Zoology , Munich , Germany.
Mitochondrial DNA A DNA Mapp Seq Anal. 2019 Jan;30(1):101-117. doi: 10.1080/24701394.2018.1462348. Epub 2018 Apr 19.
In this work, we used mtDNA data as a tool to delimit species and we compared the resulting molecular operational taxonomic units (barcode index number, BIN) with morphology-based identifications in the Colombian species of Rhamma Johnson, 1992 exploring the usefulness of DNA barcodes for taxonomy, species identification and delimitation. We obtained cytochrome oxidase I (COI) sequences for 134 morphologically identified specimens, representing 12 species of Rhamma from Colombia. Ten of these species have not been previously barcoded. DNA barcodes suggested the potential for eight additional cryptic species in Colombia but we were readily able to morphologically diagnose just one of these linages as a new species which recently was described in a separate paper as Rhamma dawkinsi Prieto & Lorenc-Brudecka, 2017. The morphological species were separated into three categories: species showing a perfect match between morphological species and BINs (33%, four species); species sharing a BIN completely or partly (single specimens) with another morphological species (42%, five species placed in three BINs); and morphological species splitting up into more than one BIN (25%, three species placed in 10 BINs). The high percentages of incongruence between morphology-based identification and species delineation through BINs, could be explained as a consequence of high rates of introgressive hybridization. However, DNA barcodes can be considered diagnostic even in cases where specimens of a species were assigned to two or more distinct BINs and in species showing a low but constant divergence causing their assignment to a single BIN, which is often the case in young, allopatric species. We retain 10 of the 12 species (83%) to be diagnostic in molecular identification.
在这项研究中,我们使用线粒体DNA数据作为界定物种的工具,并将由此产生的分子操作分类单元(条形码索引号,BIN)与基于形态学的鉴定结果进行比较,这些鉴定结果来自1992年约翰逊所描述的哥伦比亚鼠李属物种,以此探索DNA条形码在分类学、物种鉴定和界定方面的实用性。我们获得了134个经形态学鉴定的标本的细胞色素氧化酶I(COI)序列,这些标本代表了来自哥伦比亚的12种鼠李属植物。其中有10个物种此前未进行条形码分析。DNA条形码表明哥伦比亚可能还存在另外8个隐存物种,但我们仅能从形态学上诊断出其中一个谱系为新物种,该物种最近在另一篇论文中被描述为2017年的道金斯鼠李(Rhamma dawkinsi Prieto & Lorenc-Brudecka)。形态学物种被分为三类:形态学物种与BIN完全匹配的物种(33%,4个物种);与另一个形态学物种完全或部分共享一个BIN的物种(单个标本)(42%,5个物种归入3个BIN);以及形态学物种被划分为多个BIN的物种(25%,3个物种归入10个BIN)。基于形态学的鉴定与通过BIN进行的物种划分之间存在高比例的不一致,这可能是由于渐渗杂交率高所致。然而,即使在一个物种的标本被归入两个或更多不同BIN的情况下,以及在那些虽分歧度低但恒定从而被归入单个BIN的物种(年轻的异域物种常出现这种情况)中,DNA条形码仍可被视为具有诊断价值。在12个物种中,我们确定有10个物种(83%)在分子鉴定中具有诊断价值。