Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Bordeaux, Service de Néphrologie-Transplantation-Dialyse-Aphérèse, Hôpital Pellegrin, Bordeaux, France.
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Bordeaux, Laboratoire d'Immunologie et Immunogénétique, Hôpital Pellegrin, Bordeaux, France.
Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2018 Oct 1;33(10):1853-1863. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfy088.
Pathogenicity of donor-specific antibodies (DSAs) can be assessed using the single-antigen flow beads (SAFB) assays through mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) with or without serum ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) treatment, measurement of C1q or C3d binding and/or their intragraft detection [graft-bound donor-specific antibody (gDSA)]. We aimed to investigate which of these markers best associates with antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR) and kidney allograft loss at the time of a for-cause biopsy.
This retrospective, single-centre study included 77 kidney transplant recipients who underwent a for-cause biopsy between December 2004 and July 2013. All displayed serum DSAs were identified on the same day as the biopsy. Sera were tested in parallel with the classical SAFB assay with or without serum EDTA treatment, C1q- and C3d-binding assays. gDSAs were eluted from biopsy fragments and identified with SAFB.
The median time between transplantation and biopsy was 25 months (range 0.5-251). The median follow-up was 36 months (range 0-140). ABMR was histologically proven in 40% of recipients. The sensitivity and specificity of C1q, C3d and gDSA assays for predicting ABMR were 68% and 61%, 52% and 70% and 64.5% and 56.5%, respectively. At the time of biopsy, only the DSA MFI after EDTA treatment and C3d positivity were associated with graft loss. In multivariate analyses, glomerular filtration rate, transplant glomerulopathy and C4d positivity were the only factors associated with graft loss.
Our findings weaken the rationale for systematically implementing C1q, C3d or gDSA assays in this situation, because they do not independently predict ABMR and graft loss.
供体特异性抗体(DSA)的致病性可通过单抗原流式珠(SAFB)测定法,使用平均荧光强度(MFI)并结合或不结合血清乙二胺四乙酸(EDTA)处理、C1q 或 C3d 结合的测量以及/或其在移植物内的检测[移植物结合供体特异性抗体(gDSA)]来评估。我们旨在研究在因病因进行的活检时,这些标记物中哪一个与抗体介导的排斥反应(ABMR)和肾脏移植物丢失相关性最佳。
这是一项回顾性的单中心研究,纳入了 77 名在 2004 年 12 月至 2013 年 7 月期间接受因病因活检的肾移植受者。所有显示血清 DSA 的受者在活检当天均被识别。平行检测了未经 EDTA 处理的血清和经 EDTA 处理的血清,并行 C1q 和 C3d 结合测定。gDSA 从活检标本中洗脱出来,并通过 SAFB 进行鉴定。
移植后和活检之间的中位时间为 25 个月(范围 0.5-251)。中位随访时间为 36 个月(范围 0-140)。40%的受者经组织学证实存在 ABMR。C1q、C3d 和 gDSA 检测预测 ABMR 的敏感性和特异性分别为 68%和 61%、52%和 70%以及 64.5%和 56.5%。在活检时,只有 EDTA 处理后的 DSA MFI 和 C3d 阳性与移植物丢失相关。在多变量分析中,肾小球滤过率、移植肾小球病和 C4d 阳性是与移植物丢失相关的唯一因素。
我们的研究结果削弱了系统地在这种情况下实施 C1q、C3d 或 gDSA 检测的理由,因为它们不能独立预测 ABMR 和移植物丢失。