Suppr超能文献

阿达木单抗治疗与改善病情抗风湿药治疗贝赫切特综合征静脉血栓形成:70 例血管受累患者的回顾性研究。

Adalimumab-Based Treatment Versus Disease-Modifying Antirheumatic Drugs for Venous Thrombosis in Behçet's Syndrome: A Retrospective Study of Seventy Patients With Vascular Involvement.

机构信息

University of Florence and AOU Careggi, Florence, Italy.

University of Siena, Siena, Italy.

出版信息

Arthritis Rheumatol. 2018 Sep;70(9):1500-1507. doi: 10.1002/art.40531. Epub 2018 Jul 19.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Since Behçet's syndrome (BS) is the prototype of inflammation-induced thrombosis, immunosuppressants are recommended in place of anticoagulants. We undertook this study to assess the clinical efficacy and the corticosteroid-sparing effect of adalimumab (ADA)-based treatment versus disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (DMARD) therapy in a large retrospective cohort of patients with BS-related venous thrombosis.

METHODS

We retrospectively collected data on 70 BS patients treated with DMARDs or ADA-based regimens (ADA with or without DMARDs) because of venous complications. Clinical and imaging evaluations were performed to define vascular response. We explored differences in outcomes between ADA-based regimens and DMARDs with respect to efficacy, corticosteroid-sparing role, and time on treatment. We also evaluated the role of anticoagulants as concomitant treatment.

RESULTS

After a mean ± SD follow-up period of 25.7 ± 23.2 months, ADA-based regimens induced clinical and imaging improvement of venous thrombosis more frequently (P = 0.001) and rapidly (P < 0.0001) than did DMARDs. The mean dose of corticosteroids administered at the last follow-up visit was significantly lower with ADA-based regimens than with DMARDs (P < 0.0001). The time on treatment was significantly longer with ADA plus DMARDs than with DMARDs alone (P = 0.002). No differences were found in terms of efficacy and time on treatment between DMARDs or ADA-based regimens among patients who received anticoagulants and those who did not.

CONCLUSION

In this large retrospective study, we have shown that ADA-based regimens are more effective and rapid than DMARDs in inducing resolution of venous thrombosis in BS patients, allowing reduction of steroid exposure. Moreover, our findings suggest that anticoagulation does not modify the efficacy of either ADA-based regimens or DMARDs for venous complications.

摘要

目的

由于贝切特综合征(BS)是炎症诱导血栓形成的原型,因此建议使用免疫抑制剂代替抗凝剂。我们进行这项研究是为了评估阿达木单抗(ADA)为基础的治疗与疾病修正抗风湿药物(DMARD)治疗在大的BS 相关静脉血栓形成患者回顾性队列中的临床疗效和皮质类固醇节约作用。

方法

我们回顾性地收集了 70 名因静脉并发症而接受 DMARD 或 ADA 为基础方案(ADA 联合或不联合 DMARD)治疗的 BS 患者的数据。进行临床和影像学评估以确定血管反应。我们探讨了 ADA 为基础方案与 DMARD 之间在疗效、皮质类固醇节约作用和治疗时间方面的差异。我们还评估了抗凝剂作为伴随治疗的作用。

结果

在平均(±SD)25.7±23.2 个月的随访期后,ADA 为基础方案更频繁(P=0.001)且快速(P<0.0001)地诱导静脉血栓形成的临床和影像学改善,而 DMARD 则不然。在最后一次随访时,ADA 为基础方案的皮质类固醇剂量明显低于 DMARD(P<0.0001)。ADA 联合 DMARD 的治疗时间明显长于 DMARD 单药治疗(P=0.002)。在接受抗凝剂和未接受抗凝剂的患者中,DMARD 或 ADA 为基础方案在疗效和治疗时间方面没有差异。

结论

在这项大型回顾性研究中,我们表明 ADA 为基础方案在诱导 BS 患者静脉血栓形成缓解方面比 DMARD 更有效且更迅速,从而减少了类固醇的暴露。此外,我们的发现表明抗凝剂不会改变 ADA 为基础方案或 DMARD 治疗静脉并发症的疗效。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验