Maines Massimiliano, Peruzza Francesco, Zorzi Alessandro, Catanzariti Domenico, Angheben Carlo, Del Greco Maurizio
Department of Cardiology, Santa Maria del Carmine Hospital, Corso Verona 4, 38068, Rovereto, Trento, Italy.
Department of Cardiac, Thoracic and Vascular Sciences, University of Padova, Padova, Italy.
J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2018 Nov;53(2):225-231. doi: 10.1007/s10840-018-0375-6. Epub 2018 Apr 21.
The electrical coupling index (ECI) (Abbott, USA) is a marker of tissue contact and ablation depth developed particularly for atrial fibrillation treatment. We sought to evaluate if these measures can be also a marker of lesion efficacy during cavotricuspid isthmus (CTI) ablation for typical right atrial flutter.
We assessed the ECI values in patients undergoing typical right atrial flutter point-by-point ablation guided by the Ensite Velocity Contact™ (St. Jude Medical, now Abbott St. Paul, MN, USA) electroanatomic mapping system. ECI values were collected before, during (at the plateau), and after radiofrequency (RF) delivery. The physician was blinded to ECI and judged ablation efficacy according to standard parameters (impedance drop, local potential reduction, and/or split in two separate potentials). Patients were followed up at 3 and 12 months.
Fifteen consecutive patients (11 males, mean age 69.2 ± 10.6 years) with a history of typical right atrial flutter were included in this study. A total of 158 RF applications were assessed (mean 10.5 ± 6.6 per patient, range 6-28). The absolute and percentage ECI variations (pre-/post-ablation) were significantly greater when applications were effective (p < 0.001). A 12% drop in the ECI after ablation was identified by the ROC curve as the best cutoff value to discriminate between effective and ineffective ablation (sensitivity 94%, specificity 100%). Acute success was achieved in all patients with no complications and no recurrences during follow-up.
The ECI appeared a reliable index to guide CTI ablation. A 12% drop of ECI during radiofrequency energy delivery was highly accurate in identifying effective lesion.
电耦合指数(ECI,美国雅培公司)是一种特别为房颤治疗开发的组织接触和消融深度标志物。我们试图评估这些指标是否也可作为典型右房扑动三尖瓣峡部(CTI)消融术中损伤效果的标志物。
我们在Ensite Velocity Contact™(圣犹达医疗公司,现美国明尼苏达州圣保罗市雅培公司)电解剖标测系统引导下,对接受典型右房扑动点对点消融的患者评估ECI值。在射频(RF)释放前、期间(平台期)和之后收集ECI值。医生对ECI不知情,并根据标准参数(阻抗下降、局部电位降低和/或分裂为两个独立电位)判断消融效果。患者在3个月和12个月时进行随访。
本研究纳入了15例有典型右房扑动病史的连续患者(11例男性,平均年龄69.2±10.6岁)。共评估了158次RF应用(平均每位患者10.5±6.6次,范围6 - 28次)。当应用有效时,ECI的绝对和百分比变化(消融前/后)显著更大(p < 0.001)。ROC曲线确定消融后ECI下降12%为区分有效和无效消融的最佳临界值(敏感性94%,特异性100%)。所有患者均获得急性成功,随访期间无并发症且无复发。
ECI似乎是指导CTI消融的可靠指标。射频能量释放期间ECI下降12%在识别有效损伤方面高度准确。