Jackson Nicholas, McGee Michael, Ahmed Waheed, Davies Allan, Leitch Jim, Mills Mark, Cambourn Matthew, Ezad Saad, Boyle Andrew, Attia John, Nanthakumar Kumaraswamy, Barlow Malcolm
John Hunter Hospital, New Lambton, NSW, Australia; The University of Newcastle, Newcastle, NSW, Australia.
John Hunter Hospital, New Lambton, NSW, Australia; The University of Newcastle, Newcastle, NSW, Australia.
Heart Lung Circ. 2019 May;28(5):777-783. doi: 10.1016/j.hlc.2018.03.011. Epub 2018 Mar 20.
The most frequent complications from percutaneous electrophysiology procedures relate to vascular access. We sought to perform the first randomised controlled trial for femoral venous haemostasis utilising a simple and novel purse string suture (PSS) technique.
We randomised 200 consecutive patients who were referred for electrophysiology procedures at two different hospitals to either 10minutes of manual pressure or a PSS over the femoral vein and determined the incidence of vascular access site complications.
The mean age was 61.8±12.1years and 138 (69%) were male. Bleeding requiring addition pressure or a FemStop (Abbott Laboratories, Abbott Park, IL, USA) for complete haemostasis occurred in 17/99 (17%) patients in the PSS arm and 19/101 (19%) patients in the manual pressure arm (p=0.72). There were no cases of haematoma prolonging hospital stay, arterio-venous fistula, pseudoaneurysm or retroperitoneal bleeding. The mean duration to achieve haemostasis was 45seconds in the PSS arm and 10minutes 44seconds in the manual pressure arm (p<0.001). Pain/discomfort associated with haemostasis occurred in 15/99 (15%) patients in the PSS arm and in 29/101 (29%) patients receiving manual pressure (p=0.03).
In this randomised trial we demonstrate that an easy to perform PSS is as effective at achieving haemostasis as 10minutes of manual pressure for catheter ablation procedures. The PSS is considerably faster to perform and is more comfortable for patients than manual pressure.
经皮电生理手术最常见的并发症与血管穿刺有关。我们试图利用一种简单新颖的荷包缝合(PSS)技术进行首例关于股静脉止血的随机对照试验。
我们将两家不同医院连续收治的200例接受电生理手术的患者随机分为两组,一组对股静脉进行10分钟的手动压迫,另一组采用PSS技术,然后确定血管穿刺部位并发症的发生率。
患者平均年龄为61.8±12.1岁,男性138例(69%)。PSS组99例患者中有17例(17%)需要额外加压或使用FemStop(美国雅培公司,伊利诺伊州雅培公园)才能完全止血,手动压迫组101例患者中有19例(19%)需要如此(p=0.72)。没有出现血肿导致住院时间延长、动静脉瘘、假性动脉瘤或腹膜后出血的病例。PSS组止血的平均时间为45秒,手动压迫组为10分44秒(p<0.001)。PSS组99例患者中有15例(15%)在止血过程中出现疼痛/不适,接受手动压迫的101例患者中有29例(29%)出现疼痛/不适(p=0.03)。
在这项随机试验中,我们证明了对于导管消融手术,一种易于实施的PSS技术在实现止血方面与10分钟的手动压迫同样有效。PSS技术实施起来要快得多,而且对患者来说比手动压迫更舒适。