Lee Michelle V, Shaw Hillary L, Chi Tingying, Brazeal Hilary A, Holley Susan O, Appleton Catherine M
Breast Imaging Section, Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA.
Radia Inc., PS, Lynnwood, WA, USA.
Breast J. 2018 Sep;24(5):798-805. doi: 10.1111/tbj.13035. Epub 2018 Apr 24.
Although the prevalence of malignancy in average risk women under age 40 presenting with a palpable breast abnormality is low, the management of benign-appearing palpable abnormalities remains controversial. This study assesses the imaging evaluation, subsequent management, and outcomes of women under age 40 presenting with a palpable area of concern. This study also evaluates the costs, utility, and outcomes of BI-RADS 3 assessment in this patient population. A single institution retrospective case review from July 2010 through June 2013 identified women under age 40 presenting with a new palpable breast abnormality. Diagnostic imaging evaluation was performed. BI-RADS assessments and recommendations were recorded prospectively. Outcome was determined by tissue diagnosis, 2 years of surveillance, or search of the hospital tumor registry. Performance measures were calculated. Among 1440 cases, 1052 were initially assessed as BI-RADS 1 or 2 (73.1%), 184 as BI-RADS 3 (12.8%), 182 as BI-RADS 4 (12.6%), and 22 as BI-RADS 5 (1.5%). In all, 30 breast malignancies were diagnosed (cancer yield 2.1%). All 30 cancers were initially categorized as BI-RADS 4 or 5. No BI-RADS 1, 2, or 3 findings proved malignant. The imaging evaluation sensitivity was 100%, specificity was 87.7%, and accuracy was 87.9%. The negative predictive value was 100% and the positive predictive value was 14.7%. Average risk women under age 40 presenting with a palpable abnormality have a low prevalence of breast cancer. Imaging evaluation has a high sensitivity and negative predictive value, thereby allowing for confident characterization and appropriate management recommendations. For palpable solid masses with benign imaging features in women under age 40, short-term interval follow-up with subsequent periodic imaging or clinical examination for a total of 2 years is a cost-effective and safe alternative to biopsy.
尽管40岁以下平均风险女性出现可触及乳腺异常时恶性肿瘤的患病率较低,但对看似良性的可触及异常的处理仍存在争议。本研究评估了40岁以下出现可触及关注区域的女性的影像学评估、后续处理及结果。本研究还评估了该患者群体中BI-RADS 3类评估的成本、效用及结果。通过对2010年7月至2013年6月期间一家机构的回顾性病例审查,确定了40岁以下出现新的可触及乳腺异常的女性。进行了诊断性影像学评估。前瞻性记录了BI-RADS评估及建议。通过组织诊断、2年的随访或查询医院肿瘤登记系统来确定结果。计算了性能指标。在1440例病例中,1052例最初被评估为BI-RADS 1或2类(73.1%),184例为BI-RADS 3类(12.8%),182例为BI-RADS 4类(12.6%),22例为BI-RADS 5类(1.5%)。总共诊断出30例乳腺恶性肿瘤(癌症检出率2.1%)。所有30例癌症最初均被归类为BI-RADS 4或5类。没有BI-RADS 1、2或3类的检查结果被证实为恶性。影像学评估的敏感性为100%,特异性为87.7%,准确性为87.9%。阴性预测值为100%,阳性预测值为14.7%。40岁以下出现可触及异常的平均风险女性患乳腺癌的患病率较低。影像学评估具有较高的敏感性和阴性预测值,从而能够进行可靠的特征描述并给出适当的处理建议。对于40岁以下具有良性影像学特征的可触及实性肿块,短期间隔随访并随后进行总共2年的定期影像学或临床检查是一种经济有效且安全的活检替代方法。