Beygui Farzin, Van Belle Eric, Ecollan Patrick, Machecourt Jacques, Hamm Christian W, Lopez De Sa Estaeban, Flather Marcus, Verheugt Freek W A, Vicaut Eric, Zannad Faiez, Pitt Bertram, Montalescot Gilles
ACTION Study Group, Service de Cardiologie, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Caen, EA4650 Normandie Université, Caen, Basse-Normandie, France.
INSERM U1011 and Cardiology, Institut Coeur Poumon, CHRU de Lille, Lille, France.
Heart. 2018 Nov;104(22):1843-1849. doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2018-312950. Epub 2018 Apr 25.
Two recent randomised trials studied the benefit of mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRAs) in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) irrespective or in absence of heart failure. The studies were both undersized to assess hard clinical endpoints. A pooled analysis was preplanned by the steering committees.
We conducted a prespecified meta-analysis of patient-level data of patients with STEMI recruited in two multicentre superiority trials, randomised within 72 hours after symptom onset. Patients were allocated (1:1) to two MRA regimens: (1) an intravenous bolus of potassium canrenoate (200 mg) followed by oral spironolactone (25 mg once daily) versus standard therapy or (2) oral eplerenone (25-50 mg) versus placebo. The primary and key secondary outcomes, all-cause death and the composite of all-cause death or resuscitated sudden death, respectively, were assessed in the intention-to-treat population using a Cox model stratified on the study identifier.
Patients were randomly assigned to receive (n=1118) or not the MRA regimen (n=1123). After a median follow-up time of 188 days, the primary and secondary outcomes occurred in 5 (0.4%) and 17 (1.5%) patients (adjusted HR (adjHR) 0.31, 95% CI 0.11 to 0.86, p=0.03) and 6 (0.5%) and 22 (2%) patients (adjHR 0.26, 95% CI 0.10 to 0.65, p=0.004) in the MRA and control groups, respectively. There were also trends towards lower rates of cardiovascular death (p=0.06) and ventricular fibrillation (p=0.08) in the MRA group.
Our analysis suggests that compared with standard therapy, MRA regimens are associated with a reduction of death and death or resuscitated sudden death in STEMI.
最近两项随机试验研究了盐皮质激素受体拮抗剂(MRA)在ST段抬高型心肌梗死(STEMI)患者中的益处,无论患者是否存在心力衰竭。这两项研究规模均较小,无法评估硬性临床终点。指导委员会预先计划进行一项汇总分析。
我们对两项多中心优效性试验中招募的STEMI患者的个体水平数据进行了预先指定的荟萃分析,这些患者在症状发作后72小时内随机分组。患者被(1:1)分配到两种MRA治疗方案:(1)静脉推注坎利酸钾(200mg),随后口服螺内酯(每日25mg)与标准治疗相比;或(2)口服依普利酮(25 - 50mg)与安慰剂相比。在意向性治疗人群中,使用按研究标识符分层的Cox模型评估主要和关键次要结局,分别为全因死亡以及全因死亡或复苏后猝死的复合结局。
患者被随机分配接受MRA治疗方案(n = 1118)或不接受(n = 1123)。中位随访时间为188天后,MRA组和对照组中主要结局分别发生在5例(0.4%)和17例(1.5%)患者中(调整后风险比(adjHR)0.31,95%置信区间0.11至0.86,p = 0.03),次要结局分别发生在6例(0.5%)和22例(2%)患者中(adjHR 0.26, 95%置信区间0.10至0.65,p = 0.004)。MRA组中心血管死亡(p = 0.06)和心室颤动(p = 0.08)发生率也有降低趋势。
我们的分析表明,与标准治疗相比,MRA治疗方案与STEMI患者死亡以及死亡或复苏后猝死的减少相关。