Suppr超能文献

心力衰竭伴射血分数降低患者联合心脏收缩力调制和皮下除颤器治疗的长期结果

Long-term results of combined cardiac contractility modulation and subcutaneous defibrillator therapy in patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction.

作者信息

Röger Susanne, Rudic Boris, Akin Ibrahim, Shchetynska-Marinova Tetyana, Fastenrath Fabian, Tülümen Erol, Liebe Volker, El-Battrawy Ibrahim, Baumann Stefan, Kuschyk Jürgen, Borggrefe Martin

机构信息

First Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University Medical Centre Mannheim (UMM), University of Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany.

DZHK (German Centre for Cardiovascular Research) Partner Site Mannheim, Germany.

出版信息

Clin Cardiol. 2018 Apr;41(4):518-524. doi: 10.1002/clc.22919. Epub 2018 Apr 26.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Cardiac contractility modulation (CCM) is an electrical-device therapy for patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). Patients with left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≤35% also have indication for an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD), and in some cases subcutaneous ICD (S-ICD) is selected.

HYPOTHESIS

CCM and S-ICD can be combined to work efficaciously and safely.

METHODS

We report on 20 patients with HFrEF and LVEF ≤35% who received CCM and S-ICD. To exclude device interference, patients received intraoperative crosstalk testing, S-ICD testing, and bicycle exercise testing while CCM was activated. Clinical and QOL measures before CCM activation and at last follow-up were analyzed. S-ICD performance was evaluated while both CCM and S-ICD were active.

RESULTS

Mean follow-up was 34.3 months. NYHA class improved from 2.9 ± 0.4 to 2.1 ± 0.7 (P < 0.0001), Minnesota Living With Heart Failure Questionnaire score improved from 50.2 ± 23.7 to 29.6 ± 22.8 points (P < 0.0001), and LVEF improved from 24.4% ± 8.1% to 30.9% ± 9.6% (P = 0.002). Mean follow-up time with both devices active was 22 months. Three patients experienced a total of 6 episodes of sustained ventricular tachycardia, all successfully treated with first ICD shock. One case received an inappropriate shock unrelated to the concomitant CCM. One patient received an LVAD, so CCM and S-ICD were discontinued.

CONCLUSIONS

CCM and S-ICD can be successfully combined in patients with HFrEF. S-ICD and CCM remain efficacious when used together, with no interference affecting their function.

摘要

背景

心脏收缩力调制(CCM)是一种用于射血分数降低的心力衰竭(HFrEF)患者的电装置治疗方法。左心室射血分数(LVEF)≤35%的患者也有植入式心律转复除颤器(ICD)的指征,在某些情况下会选择皮下ICD(S-ICD)。

假设

CCM和S-ICD可以联合使用,安全有效。

方法

我们报告了20例HFrEF且LVEF≤35%的患者,他们接受了CCM和S-ICD治疗。为排除设备干扰,患者在CCM激活时接受了术中串扰测试、S-ICD测试和自行车运动测试。分析了CCM激活前和最后一次随访时的临床和生活质量指标。在CCM和S-ICD均激活时评估S-ICD的性能。

结果

平均随访34.3个月。纽约心脏协会(NYHA)心功能分级从2.9±0.4改善至2.1±0.7(P<0.0001),明尼苏达心力衰竭生活问卷评分从50.2±23.7分改善至29.6±22.8分(P<0.0001),LVEF从24.4%±8.1%提高至30.9%±9.6%(P=0.002)。两种设备均激活的平均随访时间为22个月。3例患者共发生6次持续性室性心动过速,均通过首次ICD电击成功治疗。1例患者接受了与同期CCM无关的不适当电击。1例患者接受了左心室辅助装置(LVAD),因此停用了CCM和S-ICD。

结论

CCM和S-ICD可以在HFrEF患者中成功联合使用。S-ICD和CCM一起使用时仍然有效,且没有干扰影响其功能。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3484/6490044/d65a5ef55b8d/CLC-41-518-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验