Suppr超能文献

耳穴贴压治疗白血病化疗后便秘的疗效观察: 系统评价和荟萃分析。

Auricular acupressure is an alternative in treating constipation in leukemia patients undergoing chemotherapy: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

机构信息

Department of hepatology, The Affiliated Hospital of North Sichuan Medical College, Nanchong, China.

Department of infectious diseases, The Affiliated Hospital of North Sichuan Medical College, Nanchong, China.

出版信息

Complement Ther Clin Pract. 2018 May;31:282-289. doi: 10.1016/j.ctcp.2018.03.005. Epub 2018 Mar 14.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Auricular acupressure (AA) therapy has been widely used in Eastern Asia and Europe to prevent constipation in leukemia patients undergoing chemotherapy. The aim of this systematic review was to review data from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of auricular acupressure therapy for preventing constipation in leukemia patients undergoing chemotherapy.

METHODS

Databases that were searched from their inception until August 2017 included: MEDLINE, EMBASE, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, as well as four Chinese databases [Chinese BioMedical Database, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, Wan-Fang Data, and the Chinese WeiPu Database]. In this systematic review, only RCTs that were related to the effects of auricular acupressure therapy on preventing constipation in leukemia patients undergoing chemotherapy were included. Study selection, data extraction, and validation were performed independently by two reviewers. Quantitative analyses of RCTs were performed using RevMan 5.3 software, and cochrane criteria for risk-of-bias were used to assess the methodological quality of the trials.

RESULTS

A total of 5 RCTs met the inclusion criteria, and most were of low methodological quality. Participants in the AA plus routine care group showed significantly greater improvements in the Bristol Stool Form (BSF) [MD = 0.55, 95% CI (0.39, 0.71), p < 0.01] with low heterogeneity (Chi = 5.01, p = 0.29, I = 20%). Moreover, when compared with routine care alone, meta-analysis of three RCTs indicated favorable statistically significant effects of AA plus routine care on the Constipation Assessment Scale (CAS) [MD = -1.51, 95% CI (-1.89, -1.14), p < 0.01] with low heterogeneity (Chi = 1.63, p = 0.44, I = 0%). Furthermore, when compared with routine care alone, meta-analysis of two RCTs demonstrated statistically significant effects of AA plus routine care on the Patient Assessment of Constipation-Quality Of Life (PAC-QOL) [MD = -1.28, 95% CI (-1.44, -1.13), p < 0.01], with low heterogeneity (Chi = 0.19, p = 0.67, I = 0%).

CONCLUSION

Taken together, as a potential safety therapy, only weak evidence supported the hypothesis that AA effectively prevented constipation in leukemia patients undergoing chemotherapy.

摘要

目的

耳穴按压(AA)疗法已在东亚和欧洲广泛应用于预防化疗的白血病患者便秘。本系统综述的目的是对耳穴按压疗法预防化疗的白血病患者便秘的随机对照试验(RCT)的数据进行综述。

方法

从建库开始至 2017 年 8 月检索的数据库包括:MEDLINE、EMBASE、Cochrane 对照试验中心注册库以及四个中文数据库[中国生物医学文献数据库、中国知网、万方数据和中国维普数据库]。在本系统综述中,仅纳入与耳穴按压疗法对预防化疗的白血病患者便秘效果相关的 RCT。由两位评审员独立进行研究选择、数据提取和验证。采用 RevMan 5.3 软件对 RCT 进行定量分析,采用 Cochrane 偏倚风险标准评估试验的方法学质量。

结果

共有 5 项 RCT 符合纳入标准,且大多数 RCT 方法学质量较低。与常规护理加 AA 组相比,BSF 评分(MD=0.55,95%CI(0.39,0.71),p<0.01)明显改善,异质性较低(Chi=5.01,p=0.29,I=20%)。此外,与单纯常规护理相比,三项 RCT 的荟萃分析表明,常规护理加 AA 对便秘评估量表(CAS)的效果具有统计学意义(MD=-1.51,95%CI(-1.89,-1.14),p<0.01),异质性较低(Chi=1.63,p=0.44,I=0%)。此外,与单纯常规护理相比,两项 RCT 的荟萃分析表明,常规护理加 AA 对患者便秘生活质量评估问卷(PAC-QOL)的效果具有统计学意义(MD=-1.28,95%CI(-1.44,-1.13),p<0.01),异质性较低(Chi=0.19,p=0.67,I=0%)。

结论

综上所述,作为一种潜在的安全疗法,只有弱证据支持 AA 可有效预防化疗的白血病患者便秘的假设。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验