Fan S T, Edgington T S
Department of Immunology, Research Institute of Scripps Clinic, La Jolla, CA 92037.
J Immunol. 1988 Sep 15;141(6):1819-27.
The molecular basis and genetic restrictions of collaboration between Th cells and macrophages (Mo) and the numbers of types of collaboration in the Ag-specific cellular immune response were analyzed. Using the response of cloned Ag-specific T cells we examined the mechanisms of induction of the macrophage procoagulant response. Two generic types of collaboration were identified. One was mediated by the lymphokine monocyte procoagulant inducing factor (MPIF) and the second mechanism was by apparent contact collaboration. The lymphokine MPIF was produced by T cells and cloned CD4+ T cells after specific Ag stimulation. Cloned CD8+ cells, most of which also exhibited cytolytic activity, produced little MPIF. There was no evident restriction of the response of Mo of different MHC or background genes. In the second collaborative pathway a subset of CD4+ cloned Th cells were able to directly collaborate by an apparent contact mechanism with Mo for the procoagulant response. There was no correlation of this latter capacity with MPIF production. In addition abrogation of protein synthesis and lymphokine production by Ag-driven clones did not abrogate the direct cell association type of collaboration. Both forms of collaboration were equally efficient across MHC incompatibility barriers and different genetic background. We conclude that there are two independent and parallel Th:Mo collaborative pathways for Ag-driven responses in this limb of the cellular immune response, i.e., a MPIF lymphokine pathway and a contact pathway, and that there are quantitative and qualitative clonal differences in the use of these two pathways. We suggest that the existence of multiple parallel pathways for cellular collaboration may occur more widely in the Th:Mo limb of the immune response in respect to other Mo effector molecules and should be explored to understand the orchestration of this limb of the immune response.
分析了Th细胞与巨噬细胞(Mo)之间协作的分子基础和遗传限制,以及抗原特异性细胞免疫应答中协作类型的数量。利用克隆的抗原特异性T细胞的应答,我们研究了巨噬细胞促凝反应的诱导机制。确定了两种一般类型的协作。一种由淋巴因子单核细胞促凝诱导因子(MPIF)介导,第二种机制是明显的接触协作。淋巴因子MPIF由T细胞和特异性抗原刺激后的克隆CD4+T细胞产生。克隆的CD8+细胞大多也表现出细胞溶解活性,但产生的MPIF很少。不同MHC或背景基因的Mo的应答没有明显限制。在第二种协作途径中,一部分CD4+克隆Th细胞能够通过明显的接触机制与Mo直接协作以产生促凝反应。后一种能力与MPIF的产生没有相关性。此外,抗原驱动的克隆对蛋白质合成和淋巴因子产生的消除并没有消除直接细胞关联类型的协作。两种协作形式在MHC不相容障碍和不同遗传背景下同样有效。我们得出结论,在细胞免疫应答的这一分支中,针对抗原驱动的应答存在两条独立且平行的Th:Mo协作途径,即MPIF淋巴因子途径和接触途径,并且在这两条途径的使用上存在数量和质量上的克隆差异。我们认为,细胞协作的多个平行途径的存在可能在免疫应答的Th:Mo分支中更广泛地发生,涉及其他Mo效应分子,应该进行探索以了解该免疫应答分支的调控。