Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Kobe, Japan.
Osaka Saiseikai Nakatsu Hospital, Division of Cardiology, Osaka, Japan.
J Cardiol. 2018 Nov;72(5):403-410. doi: 10.1016/j.jjcc.2018.04.004. Epub 2018 May 4.
Recent studies suggested protruding thrombus and atheroma after stent placement could be a substrate for subsequent adverse ischemic events. Although protruded atherothrombotic burden can be assessed as intra-stent tissue (IST) by optical coherence tomography (OCT), the effects of potent antiplatelet therapy on the acute phase resolution of IST in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) was unknown.
Ninety-six consecutive ACS patients with multi-vessel disease were enrolled in this prospective registry. In combination with aspirin, either clopidogrel or prasugrel was selected according to the date of enrolment. OCT examination was done immediately after percutaneous coronary intervention (post-PCI) and 10 days after index PCI (follow-up acute phase) to calculate averaged IST score as semi-quantitative measures of IST. High residual platelet reactivity (HRPR) was defined as platelet reactivity units (PRU)≥240 by VerifyNow P2Y12 assay (Accumetrics Inc., San Diego, CA, USA).
Thirty two patients (38 stents) were enrolled in the prasugrel group and sixty four patients (72 stents) in the clopidogrel group. Averaged IST scores post-PCI were similar between the two groups (0.68±0.41 vs. 0.68±0.40, p=0.99), which decreased in all of the prasugrel group and in 87.5% of the clopidogrel group (p=0.02). Consequently, changes in averaged IST score (delta averaged IST score) were significantly greater in the prasugrel group compared to those in the clopidogrel group (-0.411±0.288 vs. -0.299±0.270, p=0.045). The frequency of HRPR was significantly lower in the prasugrel group (10.0% vs 32.4%, p=0.028).
Prasugrel plus aspirin achieved greater acute phase reduction of IST than clopidogrel plus aspirin, which might underlie the clinical benefit of potent antiplatelet therapy in ACS. (UMIN000018751).
最近的研究表明,支架置入后突出的血栓和动脉粥样硬化可能是随后发生不良缺血事件的基础。虽然光学相干断层扫描(OCT)可以评估支架内组织(IST)的突出动脉粥样硬化负担,但在急性冠状动脉综合征(ACS)患者中,强效抗血小板治疗对急性IST 阶段的影响尚不清楚。
本前瞻性注册研究纳入了 96 例多支血管病变的 ACS 连续患者。根据登记日期,联合阿司匹林,选择氯吡格雷或普拉格雷。经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)后即刻(PCI 后)和指数 PCI 后 10 天(随访急性期)进行 OCT 检查,计算平均 IST 评分,作为 IST 的半定量指标。高残余血小板反应性(HRPR)定义为VerifyNow P2Y12 测定(Accumetrics Inc.,圣地亚哥,CA,美国)血小板反应单位(PRU)≥240。
32 例患者(38 个支架)纳入普拉格雷组,64 例患者(72 个支架)纳入氯吡格雷组。两组 PCI 后平均 IST 评分相似(0.68±0.41 vs. 0.68±0.40,p=0.99),两组均降低,普拉格雷组降低 100%,氯吡格雷组降低 87.5%(p=0.02)。因此,普拉格雷组与氯吡格雷组平均 IST 评分变化(delta 平均 IST 评分)差异有统计学意义(-0.411±0.288 vs. -0.299±0.270,p=0.045)。普拉格雷组 HRPR 发生率明显低于氯吡格雷组(10.0% vs. 32.4%,p=0.028)。
普拉格雷联合阿司匹林治疗 ACS 患者,与氯吡格雷联合阿司匹林相比,IST 急性期缓解更为明显,这可能是强效抗血小板治疗的临床获益的基础。(UMIN000018751)。