Fukumori Yohei, Nishijyo Miki, Tokita Daisuke, Miyara Kana, Ebihara Arata, Okiji Takashi
Department of Pulp Biology and Endodontics, Division of Oral Health Sciences, Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Tokyo Medical and Dental University (TMDU).
Dent Mater J. 2018 Jul 29;37(4):667-674. doi: 10.4012/dmj.2017-312. Epub 2018 May 2.
This study aimed to compare the mechanical properties of differently-tapered EndoWave nickel-titanium endodontic rotary instruments (size #30/0.04 taper and #30/0.06 taper; Group 0.04 and 0.06, respectively). Torsional and bending properties were evaluated with the cyclic fatigue test and the cantilever bending test, respectively. Canal transportation was assessed following instrumentation of curved canals in resin blocks. Torque and apical force during instrumentation were determined using an automated instrumentation and torque/force analyzing device. The number of cycles to fracture was Group 0.04>Group 0.06 (p<0.05). The bending load values were Group 0.06>Group 0.04 (p<0.05). Group 0.04 better maintained the original canal shape compared with Group 0.06. The median clockwise torque value was Group 0.06>Group 0.04 (p<0.05), whereas no significant differences were detected in the median counterclockwise torque and apical force values (p>0.05). Under the present experimental condition, 0.04- and 0.06-tapered EndoWave instruments exhibited different mechanical properties.
本研究旨在比较不同锥度的EndoWave镍钛根管旋转器械(锥度分别为#30/0.04和#30/0.06;分别为0.04组和0.06组)的力学性能。分别通过循环疲劳试验和悬臂弯曲试验评估扭转性能和弯曲性能。在树脂块中对弯曲根管进行预备后评估根管偏移情况。使用自动预备和扭矩/力分析装置测定预备过程中的扭矩和根尖力。断裂循环次数为0.04组>0.06组(p<0.05)。弯曲载荷值为0.06组>0.04组(p<0.05)。与0.06组相比,0.04组能更好地保持原始根管形态。顺时针扭矩中位数为0.06组>0.04组(p<0.05),而逆时针扭矩中位数和根尖力值未检测到显著差异(p>0.05)。在当前实验条件下,0.04锥度和0.06锥度的EndoWave器械表现出不同的力学性能。