Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, International University of Health and Welfare Hospital, 537-3 Iguchi, Nasushiobara City, Tochigi, 329-2763, Japan.
Department of Breast Surgery, Tochigi Cancer Center, 4-9-13, Yohnan, Utsunomiya City, Tochigi, 320-0834, Japan.
Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2018 Aug;42(4):964-970. doi: 10.1007/s00266-018-1145-7. Epub 2018 May 7.
In nipple reconstruction, the width, length, and thickness of modified star flaps are concerns for long-term reconstructed nipple projection. However, the flap's projection has not been analyzed, based on its thickness. The aim of the present study was to investigate how flap thickness in a modified star flap influences the resulting reconstructed nipple and achieves an appropriate flap width in design.
Sixty-three patients who underwent nipple reconstruction using a modified star flap following implant-based breast reconstruction between August 2014 and July 2016 were included in this case-controlled study. The length of laterally diverging flaps was 1.5 times their width. The thickness of each flap was measured using ultrasonography, and the average thickness was defined as the flap thickness. We investigated the correlation between the resulting reconstructed nipple and flap thickness, and the difference of the change in the reconstructed nipple projection after using a thin or thick flap.
The average flap thickness was 3.8 ± 1.7 (range 2.5-6.0) mm. There was a significant, linear correlation between the flap thickness and resulting reconstructed nipple projection (β = 0.853, p < 0.01). Furthermore, the difference between the thin and thick flaps in the resulting reconstructed nipple projection was significant (p < 0.01).
Measuring the flap thickness preoperatively may allow surgeons to achieve an appropriate flap width; otherwise, alternative methods for higher projection might be used.
This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .
在乳头重建中,改良星瓣的宽度、长度和厚度是长期重建乳头突出度的关注点。然而,基于瓣厚度,尚未对瓣的突出度进行分析。本研究旨在探讨改良星瓣的瓣厚度如何影响重建后的乳头,并在设计中实现适当的瓣宽度。
本病例对照研究纳入了 2014 年 8 月至 2016 年 7 月期间接受基于植入物的乳房重建后采用改良星瓣进行乳头重建的 63 例患者。横向发散瓣的长度为其宽度的 1.5 倍。使用超声测量每个瓣的厚度,并将平均厚度定义为瓣厚度。我们调查了重建后的乳头与瓣厚度之间的相关性,以及使用薄瓣或厚瓣后重建乳头突出度变化的差异。
平均瓣厚度为 3.8±1.7(范围 2.5-6.0)mm。瓣厚度与重建后的乳头突出度之间存在显著的线性相关(β=0.853,p<0.01)。此外,薄瓣和厚瓣之间重建乳头突出度的差异具有统计学意义(p<0.01)。
术前测量瓣厚度可以使外科医生实现适当的瓣宽度;否则,可能会使用其他方法来提高突出度。
证据等级 IV:本杂志要求作者为每篇文章分配一个证据等级。有关这些循证医学等级的完整描述,请参考目录或在线作者指南 www.springer.com/00266 。